Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767050›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Reflecting on Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Networks to Evaluate Technological Products for People Living with Dementia.

Francesca Toso, Rens Brankaert, Niels Hendriks, Lieke Lenaerts, Andrea Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesca TosoHuman Centred Design (HCD) Group, Department of Design, Production and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology (ET), University of Twente, Horst Complex, 7522 LV Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-3195
Rens BrankaertSystemic Change Group, Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Atlas Building, 5612 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0526-9370
Niels HendriksInteractions Research Group, LUCA School of Arts, C-Mine 5, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Lieke LenaertsInteractions Research Group, LUCA School of Arts, C-Mine 5, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Andrea WilkinsonInteractions Research Group, LUCA School of Arts, C-Mine 5, 3600 Genk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia is a growing societal challenge putting pressure on care systems across Europe. Providing supporting technology for people living with dementia, referring to both people with dementia and their caregivers, is an important strategy to alleviate pressure. In this paper, we present lessons learned from the Interreg NWE Project Certification-D, in which we evaluated technological products with people living with dementia, using a Living Lab approach. Living Labs were set up in five different countries to conduct field evaluations at the homes of people living with dementia. Via an open call products from small to medium enterprises across northwestern Europe were selected to be evaluated in the Living Labs. In this paper, we describe the setup of and reflection on Living Labs as multi-stakeholder collaboration networks to evaluate technological products in the context of dementia. We reflect on the experiences and insights from the Living Lab researchers to execute and operate the Living Labs in such a sensitive setting. Our findings show that Living Labs can be used to conduct field evaluations of products, that flexibility is required to adopt a Living Lab in various care settings with different stakeholder compositions and expertise, and that Living Lab researchers serve as both a linking pin and buffer between people living with dementia and companies and thereby support the adoption of technological products. We close the paper with a proposal of best practices to encourage inclusivity in, and scalability of, Living Labs in the context of dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaCaregiversEuropeHumanscertificationdementiadesignfield researchhome environmentliving labsmulti-stakeholder collaborationscalabilitytechnologies

Identifiers

PMID36767050
PMCPMC9914846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.