Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Community Health Assessment Tools Adoptable in Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.

Chiara Pazzaglia, Claudia Camedda, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Andrea Trentin, Sandra Scalorbi, Yari Longobucco

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara PazzagliaBologna Local Health Trust, 40124 Bologna, Italy.
Claudia CameddaIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4723-275X
Nikita Valentina UgentiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea TrentinAttorney at Law, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Sandra ScalorbiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Yari LongobuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2703-9349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO European Region defined the role of a new central professional for primary care, the Family and Community Nurse (FCN). The introduction of an FCN in the framework of health policies highlights a key role of nurses in addressing the needs of families and communities. A scoping review was conducted in order to identify and describe the available tools which have been adopted for the assessment of community health needs by FCNs. A comprehensive literature review on the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycInfo databases was conducted including all studies up to May 2021. A total of 1563 studies were identified and 36 of them were included. The literature review made it possible to identify studies employing twelve different community assessment tools or modalities. Referring to the WHO framework proposed in 2001, some common themes have been identified with an uneven distribution, such as profiling the population, deciding on priorities for action and public healthcare programs, implementing the planned activities, an evaluation of the health outcomes, multidisciplinary activity, flexibility and involving the community. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first attempt to provide an overview of community assessment tools, keeping the guidance provided by the WHO as a reference.

Indexed as

NursesPublic HealthHumanscommunity health assessmentCOVID-19family and community nursinghealth promotionprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID36767035
PMCPMC9914332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.