Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766986›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Interpretable Differential Diagnosis of Non-COVID Viral Pneumonia, Lung Opacity and COVID-19 Using Tuned Transfer Learning and Explainable AI.

Md Nazmul Islam, Md Golam Rabiul Alam, Tasnim Sakib Apon, Md Zia Uddin, Nasser Allheeib, Alaa Menshawi, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md Nazmul IslamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2654-7464
Md Golam Rabiul AlamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-7557
Tasnim Sakib AponDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5238-8276
Md Zia UddinSoftware and Service Innovation, SINTEF Digital, 0373 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-1834
Nasser AllheeibInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa MenshawiInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Mehedi HassanInformation Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3479-3606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus epidemic has spread to virtually every country on the globe, inflicting enormous health, financial, and emotional devastation, as well as the collapse of healthcare systems in some countries. Any automated COVID detection system that allows for fast detection of the COVID-19 infection might be highly beneficial to the healthcare service and people around the world. Molecular or antigen testing along with radiology X-ray imaging is now utilized in clinics to diagnose COVID-19. Nonetheless, due to a spike in coronavirus and hospital doctors' overwhelming workload, developing an AI-based auto-COVID detection system with high accuracy has become imperative. On X-ray images, the diagnosis of COVID-19, non-COVID-19 non-COVID viral pneumonia, and other lung opacity can be challenging. This research utilized artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver high-accuracy automated COVID-19 detection from normal chest X-ray images. Further, this study extended to differentiate COVID-19 from normal, lung opacity and non-COVID viral pneumonia images. We have employed three distinct pre-trained models that are Xception, VGG19, and ResNet50 on a benchmark dataset of 21,165 X-ray images. Initially, we formulated the COVID-19 detection problem as a binary classification problem to classify COVID-19 from normal X-ray images and gained 97.5%, 97.5%, and 93.3% accuracy for Xception, VGG19, and ResNet50 respectively. Later we focused on developing an efficient model for multi-class classification and gained an accuracy of 75% for ResNet50, 92% for VGG19, and finally 93% for Xception. Although Xception and VGG19's performances were identical, Xception proved to be more efficient with its higher precision, recall, and f-1 scores. Finally, we have employed Explainable AI on each of our utilized model which adds interpretability to our study. Furthermore, we have conducted a comprehensive comparison of the model's explanations and the study revealed that Xception is more precise in indicating the actual features that are responsible for a model's predictions.This addition of explainable AI will benefit the medical professionals greatly as they will get to visualize how a model makes its prediction and won't have to trust our developed machine-learning models blindly.

Indexed as

COVID-19explainable AIlung opacitynon-COVID viral pneumoniatransfer learningX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID36766986
PMCPMC9914430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.