Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766972›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of

Bernard Frèche, Julie Salvan, Marie Caroline Roch, Antoine Guerin, Elodie Poupin, Maxime Pichon, Christophe Burucoa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bernard FrècheDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-8848
Julie SalvanDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Marie Caroline RochDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Antoine GuerinDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Elodie PoupinDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4405-6079
Maxime PichonINSERM U1070, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3732-6894
Christophe BurucoaINSERM U1070, Faculty of Medicine Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

aimThis study aimed to synthesize knowledge on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of

methodA narrative review of the literature with an inductive content analysis of the articles was performed.

resultsThe extracted data (22 articles out of 106 included after screening of 965 articles) determined three areas of analysis: indications for screening, methods of screening and diagnosis by non-invasive tests, and treatment modalities. DISCUSSION: Targeted, easily performed screening with noninvasive tests is recommended for patients younger than 45 years of age with no family history of gastric cancer and symptoms of dyspepsia without warning signs. Given their proximity to the general population and their coverage of the territory, general practitioners are ideally positioned. Treatment modalities are well-codified and feasible in primary care. Simplifying the recommendations available to them would optimize the identification of patients at risk and the management of

Indexed as

disease managementHelicobacter pyloriinfection controlprimary carestomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36766972
PMCPMC9914135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.