Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766901›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Use of Sports Rehabilitation Robotics to Assist in the Recovery of Physical Abilities in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Diseases: A Literature Review.

Fangyuan Ju, Yujie Wang, Bin Xie, Yunxuan Mi, Mengyun Zhao, Junwei Cao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05886166 (Clinical Utility of Exoskeleton Robot Training in Patients With Septic Arthritis After a Thermal Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05886166 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Utility of Exoskeleton Robot Training in Patients With Septic Arthritis After a Thermal Injury: A Case Report

TypeinterventionalSponsorHangang Sacred Heart HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled2ConditionsSeptic Arthritis, Gait Disorder, SensorimotorArmsrobot assisted training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangyuan JuDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2046-9100
Yujie WangDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Bin XieDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Yunxuan MiDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Mengyun ZhaoDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Junwei CaoDepartment of Business, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-679X

Funding

Yangzhou University 22YJC890009.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in the number of elderly patients with degenerative diseases has brought additional medical and financial pressures, which are adding to the burden on society. The development of sports rehabilitation robotics (SRR) is becoming increasingly sophisticated at the technical level of its application; however, few studies have analyzed how it works and how effective it is in aiding rehabilitation, and fewer individualized exercise rehabilitation programs have been developed for elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the working methods and the effects of different types of SRR and then to suggest the feasibility of applying SRR to enhance the physical abilities of elderly patients with degenerative diseases. The researcher's team searched 633 English-language journal articles, which had been published over the past five years, and they selected 38 of them for a narrative literature review. Our summary found the following: (1) The current types of SRR are generally classified as end-effector robots, smart walkers, intelligent robotic rollators, and exoskeleton robots-exoskeleton robots were found to be the most widely used. (2) The current working methods include assistant tools as the main intermediaries-i.e., robots assist patients to participate; patients as the main intermediaries-i.e., patients dominate the assistant tools to participate; and sensors as the intermediaries-i.e., myoelectric-driven robots promote patient participation. (3) Better recovery was perceived for elderly patients when using SRR than is generally achieved through the traditional single-movement recovery methods, especially in strength, balance, endurance, and coordination. However, there was no significant improvement in their speed or agility after using SRR.

Indexed as

assistive technology sports rehabilitationcontinuation therapydegenerative diseaseselderrehabilitation robot

Identifiers

PMID36766901
PMCPMC9914201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.