Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766666›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Ensemble Model for the Diagnosis of Brain Tumors through MRIs.

Ehsan Ghafourian, Farshad Samadifam, Heidar Fadavian, Peren Jerfi Canatalay, AmirReza Tajally, Sittiporn Channumsin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan GhafourianDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Farshad SamadifamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-0860
Heidar FadavianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14115-111, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-020X
Peren Jerfi CanatalayComputer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Department, Halic University, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
AmirReza TajallySchool of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14179-35840, Iran.
Sittiporn ChannumsinSpace Technology Research Center, Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA), Chonburi 20230, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2344-7676

Funding

This work was also funded by Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development 578 Agency GISTDA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic brain tumor detection in MR Images is one of the basic applications of machine vision in medical image processing, which, despite much research, still needs further development. Using multiple machine learning techniques as an ensemble system is one of the solutions that can be effective in achieving this goal. In this paper, a novel method for diagnosing brain tumors by combining data mining and machine learning techniques has been proposed. In the proposed method, each image is initially pre-processed to eliminate its background region and identify brain tissue. The Social Spider Optimization (SSO) algorithm is then utilized to segment the MRI Images. The MRI Images segmentation allows for a more precise identification of the tumor region in the image. In the next step, the distinctive features of the image are extracted using the SVD technique. In addition to removing redundant information, this strategy boosts the speed of the processing at the classification stage. Finally, a combination of the algorithms Naïve Bayes, Support vector machine and K-nearest neighbor is used to classify the extracted features and detect brain tumors. Each of the three algorithms performs feature classification individually, and the final output of the proposed model is created by integrating the three independent outputs and voting the results. The results indicate that the proposed method can diagnose brain tumors in the BRATS 2014 dataset with an average accuracy of 98.61%, sensitivity of 95.79% and specificity of 99.71%. Additionally, the proposed method could diagnose brain tumors in the BTD20 database with an average accuracy of 99.13%, sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 99.26%. These results show a significant improvement compared to previous efforts. The findings confirm that using the image segmentation technique, as well as the ensemble learning, is effective in improving the efficiency of the proposed method.

Indexed as

ensemble classifiermachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingsingular value decompositionsocial spider optimization

Identifiers

PMID36766666
PMCPMC9913902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.