Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766640›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Performance Analysis of Deep Learning Algorithms in Diagnosis of Malaria Disease.

K Hemachandran, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Shahid Mohammad Ganie, Anil Audumbar Pise, M Turki-Hadj Alouane, Channabasava Chola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K HemachandranDepartment of Analytics, School of Business, Woxsen University, Hyderabad 502345, Telangana, India.
Areej AlasiryCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Mehrez MarzouguiCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-5371
Shahid Mohammad GanieDepartment of Analytics, School of Business, Woxsen University, Hyderabad 502345, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9925-0402
Anil Audumbar PiseSiatik Premier Google Cloud Platform Partner, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-087X
M Turki-Hadj AlouaneCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-0824
Channabasava CholaDepartment of Studies in Computer Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-9354

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University 257/43
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is predominant in many subtropical nations with little health-monitoring infrastructure. To forecast malaria and condense the disease's impact on the population, time series prediction models are necessary. The conventional technique of detecting malaria disease is for certified technicians to examine blood smears visually for parasite-infected RBC (red blood cells) underneath a microscope. This procedure is ineffective, and the diagnosis depends on the individual performing the test and his/her experience. Automatic image identification systems based on machine learning have previously been used to diagnose malaria blood smears. However, so far, the practical performance has been insufficient. In this paper, we have made a performance analysis of deep learning algorithms in the diagnosis of malaria disease. We have used Neural Network models like CNN, MobileNetV2, and ResNet50 to perform this analysis. The dataset was extracted from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) website and consisted of 27,558 photos, including 13,780 parasitized cell images and 13,778 uninfected cell images. In conclusion, the MobileNetV2 model outperformed by achieving an accuracy rate of 97.06% for better disease detection. Also, other metrics like training and testing loss, precision, recall, fi-score, and ROC curve were calculated to validate the considered models.

Indexed as

convolution neural networksdeep learning techniquesdisease diagnosismalariamobilenetneural networks and RBCResNet-50

Identifiers

PMID36766640
PMCPMC9914762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.