ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Role of Ensemble Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Classification in Multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequence Data.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep Learning Approaches for Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using MRI Images (2020 to 2024): A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Glancing at the role of Toxoplasma gondii in neuro-oncology: from risk factor to therapeutic target.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Multi-Class Brain Tumor Grades Classification Using a Deep Learning-Based Majority Voting Algorithm and Its Validation Using Explainable-AI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning-driven brain tumor classification and segmentation using non-contrast MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Brain Tumor Detection and Prediction in MRI Images Utilizing a Fine-Tuned Transfer Learning Model Integrated Within Deep Learning Frameworks.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AG-MSTLN-EL: A Multi-source Transfer Learning Approach to Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- XAI-MRI: an ensemble dual-modality approach for 3D brain tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Enhanced local feature extraction of lite network with scale-invariant CNN for precise segmentation of small brain tumors in MRI.PloS one · 2025Article
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Non-Invasive Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Advanced federated ensemble internet of learning approach for cloud based medical healthcare monitoring system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Four Transformer-Based Deep Learning Classifiers Embedded with an Attention U-Net-Based Lung Segmenter and Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation-Based Heatmaps for COVID-19 X-ray Scans.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in personalised framework: a scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and survival analysis on a Canadian cohort.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- BrainNet: a fusion assisted novel optimal framework of residual blocks and stacked autoencoders for multimodal brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Performance of convolutional neural networks for the classification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Novel Ensemble Framework for Multi-Classification of Brain Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in the Use of Deep Learning for the Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Image in Neuro-Oncology.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biopsy is a gold standard method for tumor grading. However, due to its invasive nature, it has sometimes proved fatal for brain tumor patients. As a result, a non-invasive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool is required. Recently, many magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based CAD tools have been proposed for brain tumor grading. The MRI has several sequences, which can express tumor structure in different ways. However, a suitable MRI sequence for brain tumor classification is not yet known. The most common brain tumor is 'glioma', which is the most fatal form. Therefore, in the proposed study, to maximize the classification ability between low-grade versus high-grade glioma, three datasets were designed comprising three MRI sequences: T1-Weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Further, five well-established convolutional neural networks, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50 were adopted for tumor classification. An ensemble algorithm was proposed using the majority vote of above five deep learning (DL) models to produce more consistent and improved results than any individual model. Five-fold cross validation (K5-CV) protocol was adopted for training and testing. For the proposed ensembled classifier with K5-CV, the highest test accuracies of 98.88 ± 0.63%, 97.98 ± 0.86%, and 94.75 ± 0.61% were achieved for FLAIR, T2W, and T1W-MRI data, respectively. FLAIR-MRI data was found to be most significant for brain tumor classification, where it showed a 4.17% and 0.91% improvement in accuracy against the T1W-MRI and T2W-MRI sequence data, respectively. The proposed ensembled algorithm (MajVot) showed significant improvements in the average accuracy of three datasets of 3.60%, 2.84%, 1.64%, 4.27%, and 1.14%, respectively, against AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.