Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766582›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Approach toward Artificial Intelligence Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using Brain Signals.

Seyed-Ali Sadegh-Zadeh, Elham Fakhri, Mahboobe Bahrami, Elnaz Bagheri, Razieh Khamsehashari, Maryam Noroozian, Amir M Hajiyavand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seyed-Ali Sadegh-ZadehDepartment of Computing, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-3410
Elham FakhriDepartment of Computing, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK.
Mahboobe BahramiBehavioral Sciences Research Center, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174533871, Iran.
Elnaz BagheriDepartment of Computing, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK.
Razieh KhamsehashariQuality and Usability, Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Maryam NoroozianCognitive Neurology and Neuropsychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran.
Amir M HajiyavandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-7866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroencephalography (EEG) signal analysis is a rapid, low-cost, and practical method for diagnosing the early stages of dementia, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The extraction of appropriate biomarkers to assess a subject's cognitive impairment has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. The aberrant progression of AD leads to cortical detachment. Due to the interaction of several brain areas, these disconnections may show up as abnormalities in functional connectivity and complicated behaviors.

methodsThis work suggests a novel method for differentiating between AD, MCI, and HC in two-class and three-class classifications based on EEG signals. To solve the class imbalance, we employ EEG data augmentation techniques, such as repeating minority classes using variational autoencoders (VAEs), as well as traditional noise-addition methods and hybrid approaches. The power spectrum density (PSD) and temporal data employed in this study's feature extraction from EEG signals were combined, and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier was used to distinguish between three categories of problems.

resultsInsufficient data and unbalanced datasets are two common problems in AD datasets. This study has shown that it is possible to generate comparable data using noise addition and VAE, train the model using these data, and, to some extent, overcome the aforementioned issues with an increase in classification accuracy of 2 to 7%.

conclusionIn this work, using EEG data, we were able to successfully detect three classes: AD, MCI, and HC. In comparison to the pre-augmentation stage, the accuracy gained in the classification of the three classes increased by 3% when the VAE model added additional data. As a result, it is clear how useful EEG data augmentation methods are for classes with smaller sample numbers.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedata augmentation strategydiagnosiselectroencephalogram (EEG)machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36766582
PMCPMC9913919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.