Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766552›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Pictorial Review on Imaging Findings in Cerebral CTP in Patients with Acute Stroke and Its Mimics: A Primer for General Radiologists.

Benedikt Haggenmüller, Kornelia Kreiser, Nico Sollmann, Magdalena Huber, Daniel Vogele, Stefan A Schmidt, Meinrad Beer, Bernd Schmitz, Yigit Ozpeynirci, Johannes Rosskopf and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CT perfusion in the acute setting: a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of aphasic syndromes.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Benedikt HaggenmüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Kornelia KreiserDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, RKU-Universitäts- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6823-5493
Nico SollmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8120-2223
Magdalena HuberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Daniel VogeleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Stefan A SchmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-4542
Meinrad BeerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7523-1979
Bernd SchmitzDepartment of Neuroradiology, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Lindenallee 2, 89312 Günzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1770-295X
Yigit OzpeynirciInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Johannes RosskopfDepartment of Neuroradiology, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Lindenallee 2, 89312 Günzburg, Germany.
Christopher KlothDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The imaging evaluation of computed tomography (CT), CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP) is of crucial importance in the setting of each emergency department for suspected cerebrovascular impairment. A fast and clear assignment of characteristic imaging findings of acute stroke and its differential diagnoses is essential for every radiologist. Different entities can mimic clinical signs of an acute stroke, thus the knowledge and fast identification of stroke mimics is important. A fast and clear assignment is necessary for a correct diagnosis and a rapid initiation of appropriate therapy. This pictorial review describes the most common imaging findings in CTP with clinical signs for acute stroke or other acute neurological disorders. The knowledge of these pictograms is therefore essential and should also be addressed in training and further education of radiologists.

Indexed as

computed tomographyCT perfusionstroke

Identifiers

PMID36766552
PMCPMC9914845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.