Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766518›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Development and External Validation of a Radiomics Model Derived from Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI for Predicting Histopathologic Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Xiaojun Hu, Changfeng Li, Qiang Wang, Xueyun Wu, Zhiyu Chen, Feng Xia, Ping Cai, Leida Zhang, Yingfang Fan, Kuansheng Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prediction of Histopathological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaojun HuThe Department of General Surgery & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China.
Changfeng LiInstitution of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Qiang WangDivision of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-6630
Xueyun WuThe Department of General Surgery & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China.
Zhiyu ChenInstitution of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Feng XiaInstitution of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Ping CaiDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Leida ZhangInstitution of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Yingfang FanThe Department of General Surgery & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China.
Kuansheng MaInstitution of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672857National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073346the 5G+ Medical and Health Application Pilot Project of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and National Health Commission of P.R. China 2021the Famous Teachers section of the Chongqing Talents Program 4246ZP112the Guangdong Province Key Research and Development Project, China 2020B010165004the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China 202206010093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important predictor of early recurrence and poor prognosis after curative treatments. This study aims to develop a radiomics model based on preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting HCC histopathologic grade and to validate its predictive performance in an independent external cohort. Clinical and imaging data of 403 consecutive HCC patients were retrospectively collected from two hospitals (265 and 138, respectively). Patients were categorized into poorly differentiated HCC and non-poorly differentiated HCC groups. A total of 851 radiomics features were extracted from the segmented tumor at the hepatobiliary phase images. Three classifiers, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, and Adaboost were adopted for modeling. The areas under the curve of the three models were 0.70, 0.67, and 0.61, respectively, in the external test cohort. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was the only significant clinicopathological variable associated with HCC grading (odds ratio: 2.75). When combining AFP, the LR+AFP model showed the best performance, with an AUC of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59-0.82) in the external test cohort. A radiomics model based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was constructed in this study to discriminate HCC with different histopathologic grades. Its good performance indicates a promise in the preoperative prediction of HCC differentiation levels.

Indexed as

gadoxetic acidhepatocellular carcinomamachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingpathologic graderadiomics

Identifiers

PMID36766518
PMCPMC9914153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.