Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766484›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Contribution of Outpatient Ultrasound Transvaginal Biopsy and Puncture in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pelvic Lesions: A Bicenter Study.

Irene Pelayo-Delgado, Javier Sancho, Mar Pelayo, Virginia Corraliza, Belen Perez-Mies, Cristina Del Valle, Leopoldo Abarca, Maria Jesus Pablos, Carmen Martin-Gromaz, Juan Ramón Pérez-Vidal and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Irene Pelayo-DelgadoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3532-5265
Javier SanchoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Mar PelayoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital HM Puerta del Sur. Hospital HM Rivas, 28938 Madrid, Spain.
Virginia CorralizaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Belen Perez-MiesDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-5182
Cristina Del ValleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Leopoldo AbarcaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Maria Jesus PablosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Martin-GromazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Juan Ramón Pérez-VidalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Inmaculada PenadesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Elvira GarciaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Maria Carmen LlanosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Juan Luis AlcazarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-0853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of transvaginal ultrasound guided biopsy and puncture of pelvic lesions is a minimally invasive technique that allows for accurate diagnosis. It has many advantages compared to other more invasive (lower complication rate) or non-invasive techniques (accurate diagnosis). Furthermore, it offers greater availability, it does not radiate, enables the study of pelvic masses accessible vaginally with ultrasound control in real time, and it is possible to use the colour Doppler avoiding puncturing large vessels among others. The main aim of the work is to describe a standardized ambulatory technique and to determine its usefulness.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of ultrasound transvaginal punctures (core needle biopsies and cytologies) and drainages of pelvic lesions performed on an outpatient basis during the last two years. The punctures were made with local anesthesia, under transvaginal ultrasound guidance with an automatic or semi-automatic 18G biopsy needle with a length of 20-25 cm and a penetration depth of 12 or 22 mm. The material obtained was sent for anatomopathological, cytological and/or microbiological study if necessary.

resultsA total of 42 women were recruited in two centers. Fifty procedures (nine punctures, seven drains, and 34 biopsies) were performed. In five cases the punction and drain provided clinical relief in benign pelvic masses. Regarding material of the biopsies performed, 15 were vaginal in women previously histerectomized, finding 10 carcinomas, eight were ovarian tumours in advanced stages or peritoneal carcinomatosis obtaining the appropriate histology in each case, seven were suspicious cervical biopsies finding carcinomas in five of them, three were myometrial biopsies including one breast carcinoma metastasis in the miometrium and a benign placental nodule, and a periurethral biopsy was performed on a woman with a history of endometrial cancer confirming recurrence. The pathological diagnosis was satisfactory in all cases, confirming the nature of the lesion (25 malignant-ten vaginal recurrences of previous gynaecological cancers, eight cases of primary ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma, four new diagnosis of cervical malignant masses, one cervical metastasis of lymphoma, one periurethral recurrence of endometrial carcinoma and one recurrence of breast cancer in the myometrium-and 23 benign). The tolerance was excellent and no complications were detected.

conclusionThe ambulatory ultrasound transvaginal puncture and drainage technique is useful for obtaining a sample for pathological and microbiological diagnosis with excellent tolerance that can be used to rule out the recurrence of malignant lesions or progression of the disease, diagnose masses not accessible to gynecological exploration (vaginal vault, myometrium or cervix) and for early histologic diagnosis in cases of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis or ovarian carcinoma as well as drainage and cytological study of cystic pelvic masses.

Indexed as

core needle biopsydiagnosisfine-needle aspiration cytologytransvaginal ultrasoundtru-cut biopsyultrasound-guided invasive procedures

Identifiers

PMID36766484
PMCPMC9913928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.