ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Ultra-Low Dose CT Chest in Acute COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Pilot Study from India.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Imaging: Combined Lung Ultrasound and Low-Dose Chest CT for Quantitative Assessment of COVID-19 Severity-A Prospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Usefulness of four-dimensional noise reduction filtering using a similarity algorithm in low-dose dynamic computed tomography for the evaluation of breast cancer: a preliminary study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of Bedside Lung Ultrasound and Chest CT on Subpleural Lesions and Lung Consolidation in ICU Patients with Severe Pneumonia.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study".European radiology · 2024Article
- Ultra-low-dose vs. standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Can clinicians identify community-acquired pneumonia on ultralow-dose CT? A diagnostic accuracy study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Do Ultrasound Lung Abnormalities Correlate to Biomarkers and Male Gender in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients? A Monocentric Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluating Lung Changes in Long COVID: Ultra-Low-Dose vs. Standard-Dose CT Chest.British journal of biomedical science · 2024Article
- Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS - Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests.British journal of biomedical science · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid increase in the number of CT acquisitions during the COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about increased radiation exposure to patients and the resultant radiation-induced health risks. It prompted researchers to explore newer CT techniques like ultra-low dose CT (ULDCT), which could improve patient safety. Our aim was to study the utility of ultra-low dose CT (ULDCT) chest in the evaluation of acute COVID-19 pneumonia with standard-dose CT (SDCT) chest as a reference standard. This was a prospective study approved by the institutional review board. 60 RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients with valid indication for CT chest underwent SDCT and ULDCT. ULDCT and SDCT were compared in terms of objective (noise and signal-to-noise ratio) and subjective (noise, sharpness, artifacts and diagnostic confidence) image quality, various imaging patterns of COVID-19, CT severity score and effective radiation dose. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ULDCT for detecting lung lesions were calculated by taking SDCT as a reference standard. The mean age of subjects was 47.2 ± 10.7 years, with 66.67% being men. 90% of ULDCT scans showed no/minimal noise and sharp images, while 93.33% had image quality of high diagnostic confidence. The major imaging findings detected by SDCT were GGOs (90%), consolidation (76.67%), septal thickening (60%), linear opacities (33.33%), crazy-paving pattern (33.33%), nodules (30%), pleural thickening (30%), lymphadenopathy (30%) and pleural effusion (23.33%). Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ULDCT for detecting most of the imaging patterns were 100% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.