Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766440›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Identification of Key Volatile Organic Compounds Released by Gastric Tissues as Potential Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer.

Paweł Mochalski, Marcis Leja, Daria Ślefarska-Wolak, Linda Mezmale, Veronika Patsko, Clemens Ager, Agnieszka Królicka, Chris A Mayhew, Gidi Shani, Hossam Haick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Mechanisms ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paweł MochalskiInstitute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, PL-25406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-1562
Marcis LejaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0319-8855
Daria Ślefarska-WolakInstitute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, PL-25406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8601-876X
Linda MezmaleInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-7765-852X
Veronika PatskoNational Cancer Institute of Ukraine, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Clemens AgerInstitute for Breath Research, University of Innsbruck, A-6850 Dornbirn, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-2059
Agnieszka KrólickaDepartment of Building Materials Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4657-1832
Chris A MayhewInstitute for Breath Research, University of Innsbruck, A-6850 Dornbirn, Austria.
Gidi ShaniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Russel Berrie Nanotechnology Institute, Technicon-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
Hossam HaickDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Russel Berrie Nanotechnology Institute, Technicon-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

Funding

ESF SAM 8.2.2.3. 8.2.2.0/20/1/006European Commission 824986National Science Center 2021/41/N/ST4/02307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolatilomics is a powerful tool capable of providing novel biomarkers for medical diagnosis and therapy monitoring. The objective of this study is to identify potential volatile biomarkers of gastric cancer.

methodsThe volatilomic signatures of gastric tissues obtained from two distinct populations were investigated using gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection.

resultsAmongst the volatiles emitted, nineteen showed differences in their headspace concentrations above the normal and cancer tissues in at least one population of patients. Headspace levels of seven compounds (hexanal, nonanal, cyclohexanone, 2-nonanone, pyrrole, pyridine, and phenol) were significantly higher above the cancer tissue, whereas eleven volatiles (ethyl acetate, acetoin, 2,3-butanedione, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-pentanone, γ-butyrolactone, DL-limonene, benzaldehyde, 2-methyl-1-propanol, benzonitrile, and 3-methyl-butanal) were higher above the non-cancerous tissue. One compound, isoprene, exhibited contradictory alterations in both cohorts. Five compounds, pyridine, ethyl acetate, acetoin, 2,3-butanedione, and 3-methyl-1-butanol, showed consistent cancer-related changes in both populations.

conclusionsPyridine is found to be the most promising biomarker candidate for detecting gastric cancer. The difference in the volatilomic signatures can be explained by cancer-related changes in the activity of certain enzymes, or pathways. The results of this study confirm that the chemical fingerprint formed by volatiles in gastric tissue is altered by gastric cancer.

Indexed as

biomarkergastric cancergastric tissueGC-MSvolatile organic compound

Identifiers

PMID36766440
PMCPMC9914709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.