Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766394›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Defining the Characteristics of Successful Biosecurity Scent Detection Dogs.

Ariella Y Moser, Wendy Y Brown, Pauleen Bennett, Peta S Taylor, Bethany Wilson, Paul McGreevy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ariella Y MoserSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-3582
Wendy Y BrownSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-3381
Pauleen BennettAnthrozoology Research Group, Department of Psychology, Counselling & Therapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5864-4464
Peta S TaylorSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-5968
Bethany WilsonSchool of Life and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8279-1931
Paul McGreevyOne Welfare Research Institute, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-8378

Funding

Australia Government Department of Agriculture, Water, and Environment n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To perform their role effectively, scent detection dogs require certain characteristics. Identifying these characteristics will inform the selection of prospective dogs and preferred approaches to their training. The current study drew upon the perspectives of industry stakeholders to identify the behavioural traits considered relevant for detection dogs in biosecurity screening roles. Dog handlers, trainers, and supervisors (

Indexed as

behavioursdetector dogdrivefocus grouppersonalityselectionsniffer dogsurveytraitsworking dog

Identifiers

PMID36766394
PMCPMC9913823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.