Identifying the Effects of Social Disruption through Translocation on African Elephants (

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Knowledge transmission, culture and the consequences of social disruption in wild elephants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
   Pooled it
2. Fence Removal Enhances Elephant Movement and Promotes Behavioural, Physiological and Ecological Functioning.Ecology and evolution · 2026
   Article
3. Movement patterns of two reintegrated African elephant (PeerJ · 2024
   Article
4. Elephants and algorithms: a review of the current and future role of AI in elephant monitoring.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as