Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36766263›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Classification Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Resistance, Resilience, and Susceptibility to

Luara A Freitas, Rodrigo P Savegnago, Anderson A C Alves, Ricardo L D Costa, Danisio P Munari, Nedenia B Stafuzza, Guilherme J M Rosa, Claudia C P Paz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of artificial intelligence in Latin American ruminant production systems.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  2. Machine learning prediction of multiple anthelmintic resistance and gastrointestinal nematode control in sheep flocks.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luara A FreitasDepartment of Genetics, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-9325
Rodrigo P SavegnagoDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48864, USA.
Anderson A C AlvesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Ricardo L D CostaSão Paulo Agency of Agribusiness and Technology, Animal Science Institute, Nova Odessa 13380-011, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-6915
Danisio P MunariSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-038X
Nedenia B StafuzzaSustainable Livestock Research Center, Animal Science Institute, São José do Rio Preto 15130-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6432-2330
Guilherme J M RosaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-6461
Claudia C P PazDepartment of Genetics, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-4552

Funding

CNPq #303972/2018-1Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001São Paulo Research Foundation #2012/15982-0São Paulo Research Foundation #2016/14522-7São Paulo Research Foundation #2017/50339-5São Paulo Research Foundation #2018/01540-2São Paulo Research Foundation #2020/03575-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the feasibility of using easy-to-measure phenotypic traits to predict sheep resistant, resilient, and susceptible to gastrointestinal nematodes, compared the classification performance of multinomial logistic regression (MLR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods, and evaluated the applicability of the best classification model on each farm. The database comprised 3654 records of 1250 Santa Inês sheep from 6 farms. The animals were classified into resistant (2605 records), resilient (939 records), and susceptible (110 records) according to fecal egg count and packed cell volume. A random oversampling method was performed to balance the dataset. The classification methods were fitted using the information of age class, the month of record, farm, sex, Famacha© degree, body weight, and body condition score as predictors, and the resistance, resilience, and susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes as the target classes to be predicted considering data from all farms randomly. An additional leave-one-farm-out cross-validation technique was used to assess prediction quality across farms. The MLR and LDA models presented good performances in predicting susceptible and resistant animals. The results suggest that the use of readily available records and easily measurable traits may provide useful information for supporting management decisions at the farm level.

Indexed as

multinomial logistic regressionOvis ariesprecisionsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36766263
PMCPMC9913374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.