Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765951›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Alterations in Natural Killer Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA).

Nic G Reitsam, Bruno Märkl, Sebastian Dintner, Eva Sipos, Przemyslaw Grochowski, Bianca Grosser, Florian Sommer, Stefan Eser, Pia Nerlinger, Frank Jordan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Energy Balance-Related Factors and Direct Tumor-Adipocyte Contact in Colorectal Cancer: Etiologic Insights from the Population-Based Netherlands Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nic G ReitsamPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0070-3158
Bruno MärklPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-850X
Sebastian DintnerPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Eva SiposPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Przemyslaw GrochowskiPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Bianca GrosserPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Florian SommerGeneral and Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-3027
Stefan EserGastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Pia NerlingerHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Frank JordanHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Andreas RankHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-0043
Phillip LöhrHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4939-279X
Johanna WaidhauserHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-1590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, our group introduced Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) as an independent prognostic predictor for a poorer outcome in colon cancer patients, which is probably based on immunologic alterations combined with a direct tumor-adipocyte interaction: the two together reflecting a distinct tumor biology. Considering it is already known that peripheral immune cells are altered in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, this study aims to investigate the changes in lymphocyte subsets in SARIFA-positive cases and correlate these changes with the local immune response.

methodsFlow cytometry was performed to analyze B, T, and natural killer (NK) cells in the peripheral blood (PB) of 45 CRC patients. Consecutively, lymphocytes in PB, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and CD56+ and CD57+ lymphocytes at the invasion front and the tumor center were compared between patients with SARIFA-positive and SARIFA-negative CRCs.

resultsWhereas no differences could be observed regarding most PB lymphocyte populations as well as TILs, NK cells were dramatically reduced in the PB of SARIFA-positive cases. Moreover, CD56 and CD57 immunohistochemistry suggested SARIFA-status-dependent changes regarding NK cells and NK-like lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment.

conclusionThis study proves that our newly introduced biomarker, SARIFA, comes along with distinct immunologic alterations, especially regarding NK cells.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerCRCflow cytometrynatural killer cellsNK cellsSARIFAStroma AReactive invasion front areastumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36765951
PMCPMC9913252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.