Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765950›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Phenolic Phytochemicals for Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of In Vivo Studies.

Samhita De, Sourav Paul, Anirban Manna, Chirantan Majumder, Koustav Pal, Nicolette Casarcia, Arijit Mondal, Sabyasachi Banerjee, Vinod Kumar Nelson, Suvranil Ghosh and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Pharmacological Efficacy of Baicalin in Inflammatory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Samhita DeDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700 054, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-8872
Sourav PaulDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713 209, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-980X
Anirban MannaDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Chirantan MajumderDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Koustav PalJawaharlal Institute Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry 605 006, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-2260
Nicolette CasarciaCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6280-7841
Arijit MondalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, M.R. College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Balisha 743 234, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-4618
Sabyasachi BanerjeeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, Asansol 713 301, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-4012
Vinod Kumar NelsonDepartment of Pharmacology, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Anantapur 515 721, India.
Suvranil GhoshDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700 054, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0003-349X
Joyita HazraDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai 600 036, India.
Ashish BhattacharjeeDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713 209, India.
Subhash Chandra MandalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India.
Mahadeb PalDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Anupam BishayeeCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9159-960X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed and second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Limitations with existing treatment regimens have demanded the search for better treatment options. Different phytochemicals with promising anti-CRC activities have been reported, with the molecular mechanism of actions still emerging. This review aims to summarize recent progress on the study of natural phenolic compounds in ameliorating CRC using in vivo models. This review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reporting and Meta-Analysis. Information on the relevant topic was gathered by searching the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases using keywords, such as "colorectal cancer" AND "phenolic compounds", "colorectal cancer" AND "polyphenol", "colorectal cancer" AND "phenolic acids", "colorectal cancer" AND "flavonoids", "colorectal cancer" AND "stilbene", and "colorectal cancer" AND "lignan" from the reputed peer-reviewed journals published over the last 20 years. Publications that incorporated in vivo experimental designs and produced statistically significant results were considered for this review. Many of these polyphenols demonstrate anti-CRC activities by inhibiting key cellular factors. This inhibition has been demonstrated by antiapoptotic effects, antiproliferative effects, or by upregulating factors responsible for cell cycle arrest or cell death in various in vivo CRC models. Numerous studies from independent laboratories have highlighted different plant phenolic compounds for their anti-CRC activities. While promising anti-CRC activity in many of these agents has created interest in this area, in-depth mechanistic and well-designed clinical studies are needed to support the therapeutic use of these compounds for the prevention and treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerin vivomolecular mechanismsphenolic compoundspreventiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID36765950
PMCPMC9913554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.