ArticleCancers2023
Impact of Aggregation Methods for Texture Features on Their Robustness Performance: Application to Nasopharyngeal
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The predictive value ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of local recurrence in cohorts of head and neck cancer patients after intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on CT radiomics: A double-center observation study.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- MRI-based radiomics nomogram to predict complete response to definitive chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of aggregation methods used for the generation of texture features on their robustness of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on
methods128 NPC patients were enrolled and 95 texture features were extracted for each patient including six feature families under different aggregation methods. For GLCM and GLRLM features, six aggregation methods were considered. For GLSZM, GLDZM, NGTDM and NGLDM features, three aggregation methods were considered. The robustness of the features affected by aggregation methods was assessed by the pair-wise intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, the effects of discretization and partial volume correction (PVC) on the percent of ICC categories of all texture features were evaluated by overall ICC instead of the pair-wise ICC.
resultsThere were 12 features with excellent pair-wise ICCs varying aggregation methods, namely joint average, sum average, autocorrelation, long run emphasis, high grey level run emphasis, short run high grey level emphasis, long run high grey level emphasis, run length variance, SZM high grey level emphasis, DZM high grey level emphasis, high grey level count emphasis and dependence count percentage. For GLCM and GLRLM features, 19/25 and 14/16 features showed excellent pair-wise ICCs varying aggregation methods (averaged and merged) on the same dimensional features (2D, 2.5D or 3D). Different discretization levels and partial volume corrections lead to consistent robustness of textural features affected by aggregation methods.
conclusionDifferent dimensional features with the same aggregation methods showed worse robustness compared with the same dimensional features with different aggregation methods. Different discretization levels and PVC algorithms had a negligible effect on the percent of ICC categories of all texture features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.