ArticleCancers2023
Response to Ovarian Stimulation for Urgent Fertility Preservation before Gonadotoxic Treatment in
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status on the outcomes of fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Reproductive Challenges in Mutated BRCA Gene Carriers: A Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Impact of Breast Cancer on Ovarian Function: Dysregulation of Cholesterol Homeostasis in Cumulus Cells and Follicular Fluid.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in YoungBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024Review
- BRCA Mutations and Fertility Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Perspectives on Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders Among Japanese Patients With Hereditary Breast Cancer Undergoing Fertility Preservation: Insights From the First Japanese Survey.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.