Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765831›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Facilitating Factors and Barriers in the Return to Work of Working Women Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Rebeca Marinas-Sanz, Isabel Iguacel, Jerónimo Maqueda, Laura Mínguez, Paula Alquézar, Raquel Andrés, Esther Pérez, Ramón Sousa, Elena Moreno-Atahonero, Dolors Solé and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Beyond breast cancer: mapping unmet needs and advancing an evidence-based framework of survivorship care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebeca Marinas-SanzScientific Research Group GIIS-063 of Aragon Institute of Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Isabel IguacelFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4242-5464
Jerónimo MaquedaDepartment of Health Promotion and Occupational Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health at Work (INSST), 28027 Madrid, Spain.
Laura MínguezScientific Research Group GIIS-063 of Aragon Institute of Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Paula AlquézarScientific Research Group GIIS-063 of Aragon Institute of Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Raquel AndrésBreast Cancer Unit, "Lozano Blesa" Clinical University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Esther PérezBreast Cancer Unit, "Lozano Blesa" Clinical University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ramón SousaBreast Cancer Unit, "Lozano Blesa" Clinical University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena Moreno-AtahoneroDepartment of Health Promotion and Occupational Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health at Work (INSST), 28027 Madrid, Spain.
Dolors SoléDepartment of Health Promotion and Occupational Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health at Work (INSST), 28027 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio GüemesBreast Cancer Unit, "Lozano Blesa" Clinical University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4437-2581
Begoña Martínez-JarretaScientific Research Group GIIS-063 of Aragon Institute of Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-9189

Funding

INSST (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health at Work) NDMAZ-UNIZAR chair of labor medicine NDMinistry of Labor and Social Economy ND
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have identified the main barriers and facilitators that breast cancer survivors experience in the return to work (RTW). The authors conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with a group of female non-metastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 6), a group of health professionals from different medical specialties (n = 8), and a third group of company managers mainly composed of human resources managers (n = 7). The study was carried out between March and December 2021 in Zaragoza (Spain). Transcripts were analyzed using inductive content analysis to identify work-related barriers and facilitators and coded by the research team. Barriers identified included physical and cognitive symptoms, psychosocial problems, lack of knowledge and coordination (health professional, patients, and managers), legal vacuum, physical change, time constraints, work characteristics (lower skilled jobs), unsupportive supervisors and coworkers, family problems and self-demand. Facilitators included family and work support, physical activity and rehabilitation, personalized attention, interdisciplinary collaboration, legal advice for workers, knowledge about breast cancer in companies, positive aspects of work, elaboration of protocols for RTW in women with breast cancer. RTW in working women with breast cancer requires a personalized and holistic view that includes the perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals and company managers.

Indexed as

breast cancerfocus groupsqualitative studyreturn to worksick leavework

Identifiers

PMID36765831
PMCPMC9913437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.