Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765787›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Exploring the Past, Present, and Future of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Glioblastoma.

Ashley B Zhang, Khashayar Mozaffari, Brian Aguirre, Victor Li, Rohan Kubba, Nilay C Desai, Darren Wei, Isaac Yang, Madhuri Wadehra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Von Hippel-Lindau/Hypoxia Inducible Factor Axis in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Jun, an Oncological Foe or Friend?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ashley B ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-6489
Khashayar MozaffariDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Brian AguirreDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Victor LiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Rohan KubbaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nilay C DesaiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Darren WeiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-9299
Isaac YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-5615
Madhuri WadehraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8514-2021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma, a WHO grade IV astrocytoma, constitutes approximately half of malignant tumors of the central nervous system. Despite technological advancements and aggressive multimodal treatment, prognosis remains dismal. The highly vascularized nature of glioblastoma enables the tumor cells to grow and invade the surrounding tissue, and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is a critical mediator of this process. Therefore, over the past decade, angiogenesis, and more specifically, the VEGF signaling pathway, has emerged as a therapeutic target for glioblastoma therapy. This led to the FDA approval of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody designed against VEGF-A, for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Despite the promising preclinical data and its theoretical effectiveness, bevacizumab has failed to improve patients' overall survival. Furthermore, several other anti-angiogenic agents that target the VEGF signaling pathway have also not demonstrated survival improvement. This suggests the presence of other compensatory angiogenic signaling pathways that surpass the anti-angiogenic effects of these agents and facilitate vascularization despite ongoing VEGF signaling inhibition. Herein, we review the current state of anti-angiogenic agents, discuss potential mechanisms of anti-angiogenic resistance, and suggest potential avenues to increase the efficacy of this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

angiogenesisglioblastomatumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36765787
PMCPMC9913517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.