Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765751›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Rapid On-Site Microscopy and Mapping of Diagnostic Biopsies for See-And-Treat Guidance of Localized Prostate Cancer Therapy.

Madeline R Behr, Shams K Halat, Andrew B Sholl, Louis Spencer Krane, Jonathan Quincy Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virtual Staining of Nonfixed Tissue Histology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Review
  2. Current Landscape of Advanced Imaging Tools for Pathology Diagnostics.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madeline R BehrDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-8336
Shams K HalatDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Andrew B ShollDepartment of Pathology, Touro Infirmary, New Orleans, LA 70115, USA.
Louis Spencer KraneDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5620-7698
Jonathan Quincy BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR003106 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
High speed automated intraoperative microscopy of the prostate circumference to ensure tumor-free margins in radical prostatectomyR01CA222831 · NCI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI BROWN, JONATHAN QUINCY · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003106NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR003106NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA222831NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer continues to be the most diagnosed non-skin malignancy in men. While up to one in eight men will be diagnosed in their lifetimes, most diagnoses are not fatal. Better lesion location accuracy combined with emerging localized treatment methods are increasingly being utilized as a treatment option to preserve healthy function in eligible patients. In locating lesions which are generally <2cc within a prostate (average size 45cc), small variance in MRI-determined boundaries, tumoral heterogeneity, patient characteristics including location of lesion and prostatic calcifications, and patient motion during the procedure can inhibit accurate sampling for diagnosis. The locations of biopsies are recorded and are then fully processed by histology and diagnosed via pathology, often days to weeks later. Utilization of real-time feedback could improve accuracy, potentially prevent repeat procedures, and allow patients to undergo treatment of clinically localized disease at earlier stages. Unfortunately, there is currently no reliable real-time feedback process for confirming diagnosis of biopsy samples. We examined the feasibility of implementing structured illumination microscopy (SIM) as a method for on-site diagnostic biopsy imaging to potentially combine the diagnostic and treatment appointments for prostate cancer patients, or to confirm tumoral margins for localized ablation procedures. We imaged biopsies from 39 patients undergoing image-guided diagnostic biopsy using a customized SIM system and a dual-color fluorescent hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) analog. The biopsy images had an average size of 342 megapixels (minimum 78.1, maximum 842) and an average imaging duration of 145 s (minimum 56, maximum 322). Comparison of urologist's suspicion of malignancy based on MRI, to pathologist diagnosis of biopsy images obtained in real time, reveals that real-time biopsy imaging could significantly improve confirmation of malignancy or tumoral margins over medical imaging alone.

Indexed as

biopsydiagnosisfluorescencelocalized therapymicroscopyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36765751
PMCPMC9913800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.