Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765725›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Pancreatic Cancer in Chronic Pancreatitis: Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Approach.

Guillaume Le Cosquer, Charlotte Maulat, Barbara Bournet, Pierre Cordelier, Etienne Buscail, Louis Buscail

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inflammation, microbiota, and pancreatic cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillaume Le CosquerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, University Hospital Centre, Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8416-5432
Charlotte MaulatDepartment of Digestive Surgery, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, University Hospital Centre, Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0384-6592
Barbara BournetDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, University Hospital Centre, Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3679-9454
Pierre CordelierToulouse Cancer Research Center, INSERM U1037, Toulouse University, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2096-7967
Etienne BuscailInstitut de Recherche en Santé Digestive, Toulouse University, INSERM U1022, INRAe, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Louis BuscailDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, University Hospital Centre, Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4276-1003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pancreatitis is one of the main risk factors for pancreatic cancer, but it is a rare event. Inflammation and oncogenes work hand in hand as key promoters of this disease. Tobacco is another co-factor. During alcoholic chronic pancreatitis, the cumulative risk of cancer is estimated at 4% after 15 to 20 years. This cumulative risk is higher in hereditary pancreatitis: 19 and 12% in the case of

Indexed as

alcohol consumptionchronic pancreatitishereditary pancreatitispancreatic ductal adenocarcinomascreeningtobacco consumption

Identifiers

PMID36765725
PMCPMC9913572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.