Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765689›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Comparisons of Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, and Irreversible Electroporation by Using Propensity Score Analysis for Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Takuya Wada, Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Kentaro Sakamaki, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tatsuya Kakegawa, Yusuke Tomita, Masakazu Abe, Yu Yoshimasu, Hirohito Takeuchi, Takao Itoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Microwave ablationJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Article
  9. Ablation manual for liver cancer.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New insights into mechanisms and interventions of locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Takuya WadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Katsutoshi SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-7806
Kentaro SakamakiCenter for Data Science, Yokohama City University, 22-2 Seto, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama-shi 236-0027, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Tatsuya KakegawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yusuke TomitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Masakazu AbeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yu YoshimasuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Hirohito TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Takao ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the diversity of thermal ablations, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), and non-thermal ablation, such as irreversible electroporation (IRE) cross-comparisons of multiple ablative modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment remain scarce. Thus, we investigated the therapeutic outcomes of different three ablation modalities in the treatment of early stage HCC.

methodsA total of 322 consecutive patients with 366 HCCs (mean tumor size ± standard deviation: 1.7 ± 0.9 cm) who underwent RFA (n = 216, 59.0%), MWA (n = 91, 28.3%), or IRE (n = 15, 4.7%) were included. Local tumor progression (LTP) rates for LTP were compared among the three modalities. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to reduce selection bias.

resultsA significant difference in 2-year LTP rates between the IRE and RFA groups (IRE, 0.0% vs. RFA, 45.0%;

conclusionIRE provides better local tumor control than RFA as a first-line therapeutic option for small perivascular HCC.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomairreversible electroporationmicrowave ablationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID36765689
PMCPMC9913859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.