ArticleCancers2023
Breast Cancer Prediction Using Fine Needle Aspiration Features and Upsampling with Supervised Machine Learning.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Privacy-Aware Synthetic Tabular Data Generation for Healthcare: Application to Sepsis Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An integrated approach of feature selection and machine learning for early detection of breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Divulging Patterns: An Analytical Review for Machine Learning Methodologies for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- The Challenge of Deep Learning for the Prevention and Automatic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Enhanced detection of diabetes mellitus using novel ensemble feature engineering approach and machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Unplanned Hospital Utilization and Chemotherapy Management From Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Parametric optimization and comparative study of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for breast cancer diagnosis.Breast disease · 2024Article
- Differentiating Primary and Recurrent Lesions in Patients with a History of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Nerve Root Compression Analysis to Find Lumbar Spine Stenosis on MRI Using CNN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- An integrative machine learning framework for classifying SEER breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common invasive cancers in women and it continues to be a worldwide medical problem since the number of cases has significantly increased over the past decade. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in women. The early detection of breast cancer can save human life but the traditional approach for detecting breast cancer disease needs various laboratory tests involving medical experts. To reduce human error and speed up breast cancer detection, an automatic system is required that would perform the diagnosis accurately and timely. Despite the research efforts for automated systems for cancer detection, a wide gap exists between the desired and provided accuracy of current approaches. To overcome this issue, this research proposes an approach for breast cancer prediction by selecting the best fine needle aspiration features. To enhance the prediction accuracy, several feature selection techniques are applied to analyze their efficacy, such as principal component analysis, singular vector decomposition, and chi-square (Chi2). Extensive experiments are performed with different features and different set sizes of features to investigate the optimal feature set. Additionally, the influence of imbalanced and balanced data using the SMOTE approach is investigated. Six classifiers including random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) are tuned to achieve increased classification accuracy. Results indicate that KNN outperforms all other classifiers on the used dataset with 20 features using SVD and with the 15 most important features using a PCA with a 100% accuracy score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.