Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765609›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Consensus Statement on the Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Based on a Delphi Study: Surgeons' Perspectives on Current Use and Future Recommendations.

Lysanne D A N de Muynck, Kevin P White, Adnan Alseidi, Elisa Bannone, Luigi Boni, Michael Bouvet, Massimo Falconi, Hans F Fuchs, Michael Ghadimi, Ines Gockel and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06198400 (Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06198400 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsPerioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Lysanne D A N de MuynckDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4035-6605
Kevin P WhiteScienceRight Research Consulting, London, ON N6A 3S9, Canada.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Elisa BannoneDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-6783
Luigi BoniDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Michael BouvetDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-2159
Massimo FalconiPancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Hans F FuchsDepartment of Surgery, University of Cologne, 50923 Köln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8050
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University of Göttingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Ines GockelDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7423-713X
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Takeaki IshizawaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
Chang Moo KangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-4658
Norihiro KokudoNational Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan.
Felix NickelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefano PartelliPancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Elena RangelovaDepartment of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rutger Jan SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fernando DipCleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2643-8831
Raul J RosenthalCleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA.
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Research Council 91619059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indocyanine green (ICG) is one of the only clinically approved near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores used during fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), but it lacks tumor specificity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Several tumor-targeted fluorescent probes have been evaluated in PDAC patients, yet no uniformity or consensus exists among the surgical community on the current and future needs of FGS during PDAC surgery. In this first-published consensus report on FGS for PDAC, expert opinions were gathered on current use and future recommendations from surgeons' perspectives. A Delphi survey was conducted among international FGS experts via Google Forms. Experts were asked to anonymously vote on 76 statements, with ≥70% agreement considered consensus and ≥80% participation/statement considered vote robustness. Consensus was reached for 61/76 statements. All statements were considered robust. All experts agreed that FGS is safe with few drawbacks during PDAC surgery, but that it should not yet be implemented routinely for tumor identification due to a lack of PDAC-specific NIR tracers and insufficient evidence proving FGS's benefit over standard methods. However, aside from tumor imaging, surgeons suggest they would benefit from visualizing vasculature and surrounding anatomy with ICG during PDAC surgery. Future research could also benefit from identifying neuroendocrine tumors. More research focusing on standardization and combining tumor identification and vital-structure imaging would greatly improve FGS's use during PDAC surgery.

Indexed as

cancer surgeryconsensusDelphifluorescence-guided surgeryindocyanine greenintraoperative imagingnear-infrared fluorescencepancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36765609
PMCPMC9913161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.