Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765593›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Organ-on-a-Chip and Microfluidic Platforms for Oncology in the UK.

Joanne Nolan, Oliver M T Pearce, Hazel R C Screen, Martin M Knight, Stefaan W Verbruggen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Air Pollution and Osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Tumor-microenvironment-on-a-chip: the construction and application.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Organ-on-chip technology: Opportunities and challenges.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne NolanCentre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Oliver M T PearceBarts Cancer Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK.
Hazel R C ScreenCentre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-0732
Martin M KnightCentre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Stefaan W VerbruggenCentre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2321-1367

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27947Cancer Research UK 29455Cancer Research UK A29455Medical Research Council MR/R02569X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ-on-chip systems are capable of replicating complex tissue structures and physiological phenomena. The fine control of biochemical and biomechanical cues within these microphysiological systems provides opportunities for cancer researchers to build complex models of the tumour microenvironment. Interest in applying organ chips to investigate mechanisms such as metastatsis and to test therapeutics has grown rapidly, and this review draws together the published research using these microfluidic platforms to study cancer. We focus on both in-house systems and commercial platforms being used in the UK for fundamental discovery science and therapeutics testing. We cover the wide variety of cancers being investigated, ranging from common carcinomas to rare sarcomas, as well as secondary cancers. We also cover the broad sweep of different matrix microenvironments, physiological mechanical stimuli and immunological effects being replicated in these models. We examine microfluidic models specifically, rather than organoids or complex tissue or cell co-cultures, which have been reviewed elsewhere. However, there is increasing interest in incorporating organoids, spheroids and other tissue cultures into microfluidic organ chips and this overlap is included. Our review includes a commentary on cancer organ-chip models being developed and used in the UK, including work conducted by members of the UK Organ-on-a-Chip Technologies Network. We conclude with a reflection on the likely future of this rapidly expanding field of oncological research.

Indexed as

cancermechanobiologymicrofluidicmicrophysiological systemoncologyorgan-on-chippre-clinical modelspheroidtumour cell

Identifiers

PMID36765593
PMCPMC9913518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.