Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765583›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Machine Learning to Predict the Response to Lenvatinib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Jun Ma, Zhiyuan Bo, Zhengxiao Zhao, Jinhuan Yang, Yan Yang, Haoqi Li, Yi Yang, Jingxian Wang, Qing Su, Juejin Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jun MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-0772
Zhiyuan BoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Zhengxiao ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Jinhuan YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Yan YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Haoqi LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Jingxian WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Qing SuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-3254
Juejin WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Kaiyu ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-0953
Zhengping YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are first-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the objective response rate (ORR) is not satisfactory. We aimed to predict the response to lenvatinib combined with TACE before treatment for unresectable HCC using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on clinical data.

methodsPatients with unresectable HCC receiving the combination therapy of lenvatinib combined with TACE from two medical centers were retrospectively collected from January 2020 to December 2021. The response to the combination therapy was evaluated over the following 4-12 weeks. Five types of ML algorithms were applied to develop the predictive models, including classification and regression tree (CART), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The performance of the models was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was applied to explain the model.

resultsA total of 125 unresectable HCC patients were included in the analysis after the inclusion and exclusion criteria, among which 42 (33.6%) patients showed progression disease (PD), 49 (39.2%) showed stable disease (SD), and 34 (27.2%) achieved partial response (PR). The nonresponse group (PD + SD) included 91 patients, while the response group (PR) included 34 patients. The top 40 most important features from all 64 clinical features were selected using the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm to develop the predictive models. The predictive power was satisfactory, with AUCs of 0.74 to 0.91. The SVM model and RF model showed the highest accuracy (86.5%), and the RF model showed the largest AUC (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.95). The SHAP summary plot and decision plot illustrated the impact of the top 40 features on the efficacy of the combination therapy, and the SHAP force plot successfully predicted the efficacy at the individualized level.

conclusionsA new predictive model based on clinical data was developed using ML algorithms, which showed favorable performance in predicting the response to lenvatinib combined with TACE for unresectable HCC. Combining ML with SHAP could provide an explicit explanation of the efficacy prediction.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomalenvatinibmachine learningShapley Additive exPlanationtransarterial chemoembolizationtreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36765583
PMCPMC9913670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.