ArticleCancers2023
Machine Learning to Predict the Response to Lenvatinib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Article
- Predicting Postoperative Survival in Patients With Malignant Biliary Obstruction Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Multicenter Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction model of microvascular invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients based on CT radiomics can assist clinical surgical decision-making: a multicenter study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prediction of stroke events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by interpretable machine learning based on perivascular adipose tissue features: a multicenter cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Osteoporotic fractures prediction in Chinese postmenopausal women: a machine learning-based multi-dimensional approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Developing an interpretable clinical-radiomics machine learning model using whole transition zone MRI analysis for improving diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MRI radiomics for diagnosing small BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: an interpretable model.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Serum calcium-based interpretable machine learning model for predicting anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multi-center study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis for Patients Receiving Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- MRI Radiomics to Predict Early Treatment Response to TACE Combined with Lenvatinib Plus a PD-1 Inhibitor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Prognosis in HCC Patients With Diabetes After TACE.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Abdominal Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Classification and Regression Trees to Predict for Survival for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Machine learning for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy effectiveness using ultrasound radiomics features and routine clinical data of patients with breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Research progress on machine algorithm prediction of liver cancer prognosis after intervention therapy.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- EDST: a decision stump based ensemble algorithm for synergistic drug combination prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are first-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the objective response rate (ORR) is not satisfactory. We aimed to predict the response to lenvatinib combined with TACE before treatment for unresectable HCC using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on clinical data.
methodsPatients with unresectable HCC receiving the combination therapy of lenvatinib combined with TACE from two medical centers were retrospectively collected from January 2020 to December 2021. The response to the combination therapy was evaluated over the following 4-12 weeks. Five types of ML algorithms were applied to develop the predictive models, including classification and regression tree (CART), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The performance of the models was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was applied to explain the model.
resultsA total of 125 unresectable HCC patients were included in the analysis after the inclusion and exclusion criteria, among which 42 (33.6%) patients showed progression disease (PD), 49 (39.2%) showed stable disease (SD), and 34 (27.2%) achieved partial response (PR). The nonresponse group (PD + SD) included 91 patients, while the response group (PR) included 34 patients. The top 40 most important features from all 64 clinical features were selected using the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm to develop the predictive models. The predictive power was satisfactory, with AUCs of 0.74 to 0.91. The SVM model and RF model showed the highest accuracy (86.5%), and the RF model showed the largest AUC (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.95). The SHAP summary plot and decision plot illustrated the impact of the top 40 features on the efficacy of the combination therapy, and the SHAP force plot successfully predicted the efficacy at the individualized level.
conclusionsA new predictive model based on clinical data was developed using ML algorithms, which showed favorable performance in predicting the response to lenvatinib combined with TACE for unresectable HCC. Combining ML with SHAP could provide an explicit explanation of the efficacy prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.