Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765419›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Extracorporeal treatment for ethylene glycol poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup.

Marc Ghannoum, Sophie Gosselin, Robert S Hoffman, Valery Lavergne, Bruno Mégarbane, Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam, Maria Rif, Siba Kallab, Steven Bird, David M Wood and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Accuracy of a Glycerol Dehydrogenase Assay for Ethylene Glycol Detection.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023
    Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Marc GhannoumResearch Center, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sophie GosselinCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CISSS) de la Montérégie-Centre Emergency Department, Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada.
Robert S HoffmanDivision of Medical Toxicology, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Valery LavergneResearch Center, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bruno MégarbaneDepartment of Medical and Toxicological Critical Care, Lariboisière Hospital, INSERM UMRS-1144, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Hossein Hassanian-MoghaddamSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maria Rif, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Siba KallabDepartment of Internal Medicine-Division of Nephrology, Lebanese American University - School of Medicine, Byblos, Lebanon.
Steven BirdDepartment of Emergency Medicine, U Mass Memorial Health, U Mass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
David M WoodClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Darren M RobertsNew South Wales Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, NSW, Australia. 1darren1@gmail.com.
EXTRIP Workgroup
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAInserm · FRKing's College London · GBLebanese American University · LBNew York University · USShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethylene glycol (EG) is metabolized into glycolate and oxalate and may cause metabolic acidemia, neurotoxicity, acute kidney injury (AKI), and death. Historically, treatment of EG toxicity included supportive care, correction of acid-base disturbances and antidotes (ethanol or fomepizole), and extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as hemodialysis. With the wider availability of fomepizole, the indications for ECTRs in EG poisoning are debated. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXTRIP methods to determine the utility of ECTRs in the management of EG toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations, either strong ("we recommend") or weak/conditional ("we suggest"), were graded according to the GRADE approach. A total of 226 articles met inclusion criteria. EG was assessed as dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis (level of evidence = B) as was glycolate (Level of evidence = C). Clinical data were available for analysis on 446 patients, in whom overall mortality was 18.7%. In the subgroup of patients with a glycolate concentration ≤ 12 mmol/L (or anion gap ≤ 28 mmol/L), mortality was 3.6%; in this subgroup, outcomes in patients receiving ECTR were not better than in those who did not receive ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup made the following recommendations for the use of ECTR in addition to supportive care over supportive care alone in the management of EG poisoning (very low quality of evidence for all recommendations): i) Suggest ECTR if fomepizole is used and EG concentration > 50 mmol/L OR osmol gap > 50; or ii) Recommend ECTR if ethanol is used and EG concentration > 50 mmol/L OR osmol gap > 50; or iii) Recommend ECTR if glycolate concentration is > 12 mmol/L or anion gap > 27 mmol/L; or iv) Suggest ECTR if glycolate concentration 8-12 mmol/L or anion gap 23-27 mmol/L; or v) Recommend ECTR if there are severe clinical features (coma, seizures, or AKI). In most settings, the workgroup recommends using intermittent hemodialysis over other ECTRs. If intermittent hemodialysis is not available, CKRT is recommended over other types of ECTR. Cessation of ECTR is recommended once the anion gap is < 18 mmol/L or suggested if EG concentration is < 4 mmol/L. The dosage of antidotes (fomepizole or ethanol) needs to be adjusted during ECTR.

Indexed as

AntidotesPoisoningEthanolEthylene GlycolFomepizoleGlycolatesHumansRenal DialysisAntidotesEthanolEthylene GlycolFomepizoleGlycolatesglycolic acidCKRTEthylene glycolEXTRIPHemodialysisPoisoning

Identifiers

PMID36765419
PMCPMC9921105
OpenAlexW4319958323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.