Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36765352›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Anna MacDowall, Håkan Löfgren, Erik Edström, Helena Brisby, Catharina Parai, Adrian Elmi-Terander

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04936074 (Comparison of Posterior Muscle-preserving Selective Laminectomy and Laminectomy With Fusion for Treating Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04936074 narecruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Posterior Muscle-preserving Selective Laminectomy and Laminectomy With Fusion for Treating Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Myelopathy Randomized Controlled Trial (MyRanC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala University HospitalRan2022 to 2033Enrolled300ConditionsCervical Spondylotic MyelopathyArmsMuscle preserving selective laminectomy, Laminectomy with instrumented fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MacDowallDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Entrance 61, 6th floor, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden. anna.macdowall@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-7608
Håkan LöfgrenNeuro-Orthopedic Center, Jönköping, Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Erik EdströmDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helena BrisbyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Catharina ParaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderCapio, Spine Center Stockholm, Upplands-Väsby, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. The patients are often frail and susceptible to complications. Posterior surgical techniques involving non-fusion are complicated by postlaminectomy kyphosis and instrumented fusion techniques by distal junction kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or implant failure. The optimal surgical approach is still a matter of controversy. Since anterior and posterior fusion techniques have been compared without presenting any superiority, the objective of this study is to compare stand-alone laminectomy with laminectomy and fusion to determine which treatment has the lowest frequency of reoperations.

methodsThis is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel-group non-inferiority trial. A total of 300 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint is reoperation for any reason at 5 years of follow-up. Sample size and power calculation were performed by estimating the reoperation rate after laminectomy to 3.5% and after laminectomy with fusion to 7.4% based on the data from the Swedish spine registry (Swespine) on patients with CSM. Secondary outcomes are the patient-derived Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P-mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), development of kyphosis measured as the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and death. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. The main inclusion criterium is 1-4 levels of CSM in the subaxial spine, C3-C7. The REDcap software will be used for safe data management. Data will be analyzed according to the modified intention to treat (mITT) population, defined as randomized patients who are still alive without having emigrated or left the study after 2 and 5 years. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing two of the most common surgical treatments for CSM: the posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion. The results of the myelopathy randomized controlled (MyRanC) study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for CSM. This may result in improvements in surgical treatment and clinical practice regarding CSM.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04936074 . Registered on 23 June 2021.

Indexed as

KyphosisSpinal Cord DiseasesSpinal FusionSpondylosisAdultAgedCervical VertebraeHumansLaminectomyMulticenter Studies as TopicMusclesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCervical fusionCervical spondylotic myelopathyDegenerative cervical myelopathyLaminectomyRandomized controlled trialReoperations

Identifiers

PMID36765352
PMCPMC9921403
OpenAlexW4319869985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.