Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023
Evaluating the effects of Esmolol on cardiac function in patients with Septic cardiomyopathy by Speck-tracking echocardiography-a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the efficacy of esmolol in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain for short-term mortality in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Esmolol Versus Landiolol on Mortality in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Critical care medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Mortality in septic patients treated with short-acting betablockers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of early use of norepinephrine combined with esmolol on hemodynamic stability and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The Neuroimmune Axis in Sepsis: From Pathophysiological Circuits to Precision Neuromodulation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Therapeutical progress in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of combined aspirin and statin therapy on mortality reduction in sepsis-induced myocardial injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Sympathetic regulation of the host immune response to bacterial sepsis.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025Review
- The pros and cons of beta-blockers in sepsis: Where do we stand in 2024?Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Article
- Metoprolol use is associated with improved outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Observational
- Efficacy of β-Blockers in Decreasing Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- Effect of ultrashort-acting β-blockers on 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Research Progress on the Mechanism and Management of Septic Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review.Emergency medicine international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsmolol as one treatment of sepsis induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is still controversial. The objective of this study is to evaluate cardiac function after reducing heart rate by Esmolol in patients with SIC using speck-tracking echocardiography.
methodsThis study was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled study. A total of 100 SIC patients with a heart rate more than 100/min, admitted to the Intensive Care Department of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021, were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into the Esmolol group (Group E) and the conventional treatment group (Group C), each with 50 cases. The target heart rate of patients in Group E was controlled between 80/min and 100/min. Speck-tracking echocardiography (STE) and pulse indicating continuous cardiac output monitoring (PICCO) were performed in both groups at 1 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 7 d after admission, with data concerning left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global ejection fraction (GEF), left ventricular systolic force index (dP/dtmx) were obtained, respectively. Hemodynamics and other safety indicators were monitored throughout the whole process. These subjects were followed up to 90 d, with their mortality recorded at Day 28 and Day 90, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.
resultsWith 24 h of Esmolol, all patients in Group E achieved the target heart rate, and there was no deterioration of GLS, or adverse events. However, compared with those in Group C, their GLS, GEF and dP/dtmx were increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared with patients in Group C, those in Group E had lower short-term mortality, and logistic regression analysis also suggested that Esmolol improved patient outcomes.
conclusionIn SIC patients, the application of Esmolol to lower heart rate decreased their short-term mortality while not making any impairment on the myocardial contractility.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100047513. Registered June 20, 2021- Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx . The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.