ArticleScientific reports2023
Electrically evoked mismatch negativity responses to loudness and pitch cues in cochlear implant users.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validating electrical stimulation through the somatosensory system: a perspective on mismatch negativity and auditory prostheses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Electrically evoked mismatch negativity from speech stimuli as an objective measure of cochlear implant performance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective measurements could improve cochlear implant (CI) fitting, especially for CI users who have difficulty assessing their hearing impressions. In this study, we investigated the electrically evoked mismatch negativity (eMMN) brain potential as a mainly preattentive response to pitch and loudness changes. In an electrophysiological exploratory study with 21 CI users, pitch and loudness cues were presented in controlled oddball paradigms that directly electrically stimulated the CI via software. Out of them 17 valid data sets were analyzed. A pitch cue was produced by changing the stimulating CI electrodes (pairs of adjacent electrodes). A loudness cue originated from changing the stimulation amplitude on one CI electrode. MMN responses were measured unsing clinical electroencephalography recording according to a standard recording protocol. At the group level, significant eMMN responses were elicited for loudness cues and for pitch cues at basal electrode pairs but not at apical electrode pairs. The effect of deviance direction was not significant and no stimulus artifacts were observed. Recording an electrically evoked MMN in response to loudness changes in CI users is generally feasible, and is, therefore, promising to support CI fitting procedures in the future. Detection of pitch cues would require a greater electrode distance between selected electrodes for standard and deviant stimuli, especially in apical regions. A routine clinical setup can be used to measure eMMN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.