ArticleScientific reports2023
Diagnosis of coronary layered plaque by deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary plaque healing: a safety net or a hazard indicator?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Computational Analysis of Intravascular OCT Images for Future Clinical Support: A Comprehensive Review.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in fundus photography for type 2 diabetes: a scoping review of systemic biomarkers and multi-organ risk prediction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Review and recommendations for using artificial intelligence in intracoronary optical coherence tomography analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healed coronary plaques, morphologically characterized by a layered phenotype, are signs of previous plaque destabilization and healing. Recent optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies demonstrated that layered plaque is associated with higher levels of local and systemic inflammation and rapid plaque progression. However, the diagnosis of layered plaque needs expertise in OCT image analysis and is susceptible to inter-observer variability. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for an accurate diagnosis of layered plaque. A Visual Transformer (ViT)-based DL model that integrates information from adjacent frames emulating the cardiologists who review consecutive OCT frames to make a diagnosis was developed and compared with the standard convolutional neural network (CNN) model. A total of 237,021 cross-sectional OCT images from 581 patients collected from 8 sites were used for training and internal validation, and 65,394 images from 292 patients collected from another site were used for external validation. In the five-fold cross-validation, the ViT-based model provided better performance (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.860; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.855-0.866) than the standard CNN-based model (AUC: 0.799; 95% CI: 0.792-0.805). The ViT-based model (AUC: 0.845; 95% CI: 0.837-0.853) also surpassed the standard CNN-based model (AUC: 0.791; 95% CI: 0.782-0.800) in the external validation. The ViT-based DL model can accurately diagnose a layered plaque, which could help risk stratification for cardiac events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.