Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764942›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2023

Meniscus repair via collagen matrix wrapping and bone marrow injection: clinical and biomolecular study.

Paweł Bąkowski, Adam Aron Mieloch, Filip Porzucek, Monika Mańkowska, Kinga Ciemieniewska-Gorzela, Jakub Naczk, Tomasz Piontek, Jakub Dalibor Rybka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Advances in immunomodulatory strategies for meniscal regeneration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paweł BąkowskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Poznan, Poland.
Adam Aron MielochCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland.
Filip PorzucekCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland.
Monika MańkowskaCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland.
Kinga Ciemieniewska-GorzelaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Poznan, Poland.
Jakub NaczkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz PiontekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Poznan, Poland.
Jakub Dalibor RybkaCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland. jrybka@amu.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9633-9900
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLRehasport Clinic · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe functional outcomes of arthroscopic matrix-based meniscus repair (AMMR) in patients two and five years after the treatment clearly show that the use of the collagen matrix and bone marrow aspirate creates favorable biological conditions for meniscus healing. This study not only provides ten follow-up results but also investigates biomolecular mechanisms governing the regenerative process.

methodsCase series was based on data collected from patients who underwent AMMR procedure, starting with preoperatively through two-year and five-year till ten-year follow-up. The outcomes are presented as IKDC and the Lysholm subjective scores as well as the imaging results. Biomolecular investigation of the membranes utilized in the AMMR procedure include DNA content analysis, cell viability and proliferation study of bone marrow and bone marrow concentrate-derived cells, and cytokine array performed on monocytes cultured on the membranes.

conclusionData collected from patients who underwent AMMR procedure, starting with pre-operatively through two year and five year till ten year follow-up, indicate the possibility for long-term, stable meniscus preservation. Outcomes are manifested with a visible improvement of the IKDC and the Lysholm subjective scores as well as in the imaging results. The type of the meniscal tear or complexity of the knee injury (isolated AMMR vs. AMMR + ACL) did not affect the clinical outcomes. The study highlighted the role of the membrane in facilitating cell adhesion and proliferation. Additionally, several cytokines were selected as potentially crucial products of the membrane vs. monocyte interactions, driving the tissue regeneration and remodeling. Interestingly, thresholds of what constitutes a safe and well-decellularized membrane according to relevant literature have been significantly breached, but ultimately did not elicit detrimental side effects.

Indexed as

Knee InjuriesMeniscusArthroscopyBone MarrowCollagenFollow-Up StudiesHumansMenisci, TibialTreatment OutcomeCollagenACL; KneeAMMRCollagen membraneKneeLigamentsMatrix wrappingMeniscus; Biologic healing enhancement; Bone marrow aspirate concentrate; Cell/molecular biology; Meniscus repair

Identifiers

PMID36764942
PMCPMC10522727
OpenAlexW4320033121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.