Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764807›Full record

ReviewClinics in laboratory medicine2023

Clinical Artificial Intelligence: Design Principles and Fallacies.

Matthew B A McDermott, Bret Nestor, Peter Szolovits

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew B A McDermottCSAIL, MIT, 32 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: matthew_mcdermott@hms.harvard.edu.
Bret NestorDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 40 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada.
Peter SzolovitsCSAIL, MIT, 32 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Funding

Modeling the Incompleteness and Biases of Health DataR01LM013337 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUO, YUAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) is anticipated to offer new abilities in clinical decision support, diagnostic reasoning, precision medicine, clinical operational support, and clinical research, but careful concern is needed to ensure these technologies work effectively in the clinic. Here, we detail the clinical ML/AI design process, identifying several key questions and detailing several common forms of issues that arise with ML tools, as motivated by real-world examples, such that clinicians and researchers can better anticipate and correct for such issues in their own use of ML/AI techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalMachine LearningPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceIrresponsibilityMachine learningMisspecificationUninterpretability

Identifiers

PMID36764807
PMCPMC12713168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.