Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764726›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and social media on the behaviour of pregnant and lactating women towards vaccination: a scoping review.

Larissa De Brabandere, Greet Hendrickx, Karolien Poels, Walter Daelemans, Pierre Van Damme, Kirsten Maertens

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Missed opportunities for maternal immunisation against influenza and COVID-19, Norway, October 2023 to May 2024: a population-based registry study.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Vaccinations in pregnancy against TORCH pathogens.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Larissa De BrabandereCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-2490
Greet HendrickxCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0099-272X
Karolien PoelsDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-0293
Walter DaelemansDepartment of Linguistics, Computational Linguistics and Psycholinguistics Research Centre, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9832-7890
Pierre Van DammeCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8642-1249
Kirsten MaertensCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium kirsten.maertens@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-441X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women, foetuses and infants are at risk of infectious disease-related complications. Maternal vaccination is a strategy developed to better protect pregnant women and their offspring against infectious disease-related morbidity and mortality. Vaccines against influenza, pertussis and recently also COVID-19 are widely recommended for pregnant women. Yet, there is still a significant amount of hesitation towards maternal vaccination policies. Furthermore, contradictory messages circulating social media impact vaccine confidence.

objectivesThis scoping review aims to reveal how COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination impacted vaccine confidence in pregnant and lactating women. Additionally, this review studied the role social media plays in creating opinions towards vaccination in these target groups. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published between 23 November 2018 and 18 July 2022 that are linked to the objectives of this review were included. Reviews, articles not focusing on the target group, abstracts, articles describing outcomes of COVID-19 infection/COVID-19 vaccination were excluded. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: The PubMed database was searched to select articles. Search terms used were linked to pregnancy, lactation, vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, COVID-19 and social media. CHARTING

methodsIncluded articles were abstracted and synthesised by one reviewer. Verification was done by a second reviewer. Disagreements were addressed through discussion between reviewers and other researchers.

resultsPregnant and lactating women are generally less likely to accept a COVID-19 vaccine compared with non-pregnant and non-nursing women. The main reason to refuse maternal vaccination is safety concerns. A positive link was detected between COVID-19 vaccine willingness and acceptance of other vaccines during pregnancy. The internet and social media are identified as important information sources for maternal vaccination. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionVaccine hesitancy in pregnant and lactating women remains an important issue, expressing the need for effective interventions to increase vaccine confidence and coverage. The role social media plays in vaccine uptake remains unclear.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansLactationPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19PREVENTIVE MEDICINEPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36764726
PMCPMC9922880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.