Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764718›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Carlos Gevers-Montoro, Arantxa Ortega-De Mues, Mathieu Piché

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05162924 (Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Patients With Primary Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05162924 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Patients With Primary Chronic Low Back Pain: a Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorReal Centro Universitario Maria CristinaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled147ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsSpinal Manipulation, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos Gevers-MontoroChiropractic, Real Centro Universitario Escorial Maria Cristina, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-8808
Arantxa Ortega-De MuesChiropractic, Real Centro Universitario Escorial Maria Cristina, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain.
Mathieu PichéDepartment of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada mathieu.piche@uqtr.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-2226
Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina · ESLaboratoire de Psychologie : Cognition, Comportement, Communication · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Identifying subgroups of patients afflicted with CLBP is a current research priority, for which a classification system based on pain mechanisms was proposed. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recommended for the management of CLBP. Yet, little data are available regarding its mechanisms of action, making it difficult to match this intervention to the patients who may benefit the most. It was suggested that SMT may influence mechanisms associated with central sensitisation. Therefore, classifying patients with CLBP according to central sensitisation mechanisms may help predict their response to SMT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a randomised placebo-controlled trial aiming to examine which variables linked to central sensitisation may help predict the clinical response to SMT in a cohort of patients with CLBP. One hundred patients with chronic primary low back pain will be randomised to receive 12 sessions of SMT or placebo SMT over a 4-week period. Pain intensity and disability will be assessed as primary outcomes after completing the 4-week treatment (primary endpoint), and at 4-week and 12-week follow-ups. Baseline values of two pain questionnaires, lumbar pressure pain thresholds, concentrations of an inflammatory cytokine and expectations of pain relief will be entered as predictors of the response to SMT in a multiple regression model. Changes in these variables after treatment will be used in a second multiple regression model. The reference values of these predictors will be measured from 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls to allow interpretation of values in patients. Mixed analyses of variance will also be conducted to compare the primary outcomes and the predictors between groups (SMT vs placebo) over time (baseline vs post-treatment). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Fundación Jiménez Díaz Clinical Research Ethics Committee. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05162924.

Indexed as

ChiropracticChronic PainLow Back PainManipulation, SpinalHumansPain ThresholdRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpineTreatment OutcomeBack painClinical trialsCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEIMMUNOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36764718
PMCPMC9923302
OpenAlexW4319957213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.