Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764710›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Romany McGuffog, Catherine Chamberlain, Jaqui Hughes, Kelvin Kong, Mark Wenitong, Jamie Bryant, Alex Brown, Sandra J Eades, Kalinda E Griffiths, Felicity Collis and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reflections on the Application of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations' Research Principles in a Photovoice Food Security Study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Romany McGuffogSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia romany.mcguffog@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-6199
Catherine ChamberlainJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursery and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jaqui HughesRural and Remote Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory, Australia.
Kelvin KongSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark WenitongLowitja Institute, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Jamie BryantSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Alex BrownIndigenous Genomics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Sandra J EadesFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kalinda E GriffithsCentre for Big Data Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Felicity CollisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Breanne HobdenHunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter O'MaraSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Tanika RidgewaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Maggie WalterSchool of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Michelle KennedySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-068X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AUFlinders University · AULowitja Institute · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConducting ethical and high-quality health research is crucial for informing public health policy and service delivery to reduce the high and inequitable burden of disease experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Ethical guidelines and principles specifically for health research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been developed for use since 1987. However, there has been limited examination of how these are being applied to the conduct of research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this research project has been granted by National, State and Territory Human Research Ethics Committees. This research has been developed in collaboration with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation representatives, Aboriginal community members, the National Health Leadership Forum, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research team. The knowledge translation plan will be integrated and revised throughout the project as partnerships and engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities continue. All findings will be shared with peak Aboriginal research bodies and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in ways that are meaningful to them.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesEthics, ResearchHealth Services, IndigenousHumansPopulation GroupsSurveys and QuestionnairesPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID36764710
PMCPMC9923310
OpenAlexW4319919798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.