Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36764504›Full record

ArticleRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2023

Primary site of constriction during the compression phase of cough in healthy young adults.

Ja Young Kim, Paul W Davenport, Yuhan Mou, Karen Hegland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ja Young KimGraduate Program in Speech-Language Pathology, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea 03722. Electronic address: kuadslp@gmail.com.
Paul W DavenportDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, 1333 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: pdavenpo@ufl.edu.
Yuhan MouDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: ymou@phhp.ufl.edu.
Karen HeglandDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: kwheeler@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

Mechanisms of airway protection dysfunction in Parkinson's diseaseR01HD091658 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HEGLAND, KAREN W · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glottal closure has been considered as the primary constriction point during the compression phase (CP); however, vocal fold adduction alone cannot resist the high pressures, providing motivation to explore other mechanisms contributing to that resistance. The goal of this study was to identify site(s) and degree of constriction during the CP of cough of varying types in healthy young adults. Twenty-five healthy young participants participated in this study. The experimental protocol was comprised of: 1) baseline pulmonary function measures; 2) cough practice to establish weak, moderate and strong coughs; 3) voluntary and reflex cough assessments with fluoroscopy and airflow measures. We used a repeated measures ANOVA to identify whether there are differences in constriction ratio between cough types. There was a significant difference in constriction of varying cough types. Degree of constriction in all cough strengths showed that the glottis was the most constricted area, followed by the laryngeal vestibule, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx, and cervical trachea, in order, but stronger cough resulted in more constriction in all areas compared to weaker cough. Degree of constriction in reflex cough showed a similar pattern though there was greater constriction in the oropharynx than the hypopharynx. Airflow measures in voluntary cough were consistent with previous findings. Differences in upper airway constriction during the compression phase of cough may be attributed to differences in motor control between reflex and voluntary cough, and the increased constriction seen during strong cough may reflect increased muscle recruitment during that task. In the future, we can use this knowledge to develop novel methods for cough rehabilitation.

Indexed as

CoughLarynxConstrictionGlottisHumansReflexYoung AdultCompression phase of coughConstriction ratioConstriction sitesReflex coughVoluntary cough

Identifiers

PMID36764504
PMCPMC10067529
OpenAlexW4319770280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.