ArticleRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2023
Primary site of constriction during the compression phase of cough in healthy young adults.
Article in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypotussic cough in persons with dysphagia: biobehavioral interventions and pathways to clinical implementation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Glottal closure has been considered as the primary constriction point during the compression phase (CP); however, vocal fold adduction alone cannot resist the high pressures, providing motivation to explore other mechanisms contributing to that resistance. The goal of this study was to identify site(s) and degree of constriction during the CP of cough of varying types in healthy young adults. Twenty-five healthy young participants participated in this study. The experimental protocol was comprised of: 1) baseline pulmonary function measures; 2) cough practice to establish weak, moderate and strong coughs; 3) voluntary and reflex cough assessments with fluoroscopy and airflow measures. We used a repeated measures ANOVA to identify whether there are differences in constriction ratio between cough types. There was a significant difference in constriction of varying cough types. Degree of constriction in all cough strengths showed that the glottis was the most constricted area, followed by the laryngeal vestibule, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx, and cervical trachea, in order, but stronger cough resulted in more constriction in all areas compared to weaker cough. Degree of constriction in reflex cough showed a similar pattern though there was greater constriction in the oropharynx than the hypopharynx. Airflow measures in voluntary cough were consistent with previous findings. Differences in upper airway constriction during the compression phase of cough may be attributed to differences in motor control between reflex and voluntary cough, and the increased constriction seen during strong cough may reflect increased muscle recruitment during that task. In the future, we can use this knowledge to develop novel methods for cough rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.