ArticleJournal of radiation research2023
Effects of irradiation on cumulative mortality in mice: shifting toward a younger age of death.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and activity of the planning and acting network for low dose radiation research in Japan (PLANET): 2016-2023.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the question of whether cancer risk is only accelerated but not increased by radiation exposure has been raised. To explore this matter, we analyzed whether the cumulative mortality of irradiated mice could be explained by x-axis (age) shifted cumulative mortality of nonirradiated mice. We reanalyzed publicly available data on observed cumulative mortality or prevalence in irradiated female B6C3F1 mice that lived their entire lifespan. The results showed that the irradiated curve was well matched to uniformly shifted nonirradiated curve for the cumulative mortality of all causes of death but not for the cumulative mortality of all solid tumors and prevalence of ovarian tumors as is. After adjusting lifetime mortalities, it was also well matched for all solid and ovarian tumors. The shifted days by irradiation were 71-116 days for all causes of death, 56-135 days for all solid tumors, and 41-140 days for ovarian tumors in the 1.9 Gy-irradiated group. The response was switched between irradiation at 35 and 105 days consistently for all the above indexes, supporting the hypothesis that radiation sensitivity differs between juvenile and adults. The shifted days of all causes of death showed a tendency of linear response to dose. This concept of shifting the age of death can be applied not only for all cause of death but also for mortality of all solid tumors after adjusting the magnitude. These findings contribute to the discussion on the application of the 'shifting age of death' concept to radiation protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.