Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A qualitative study of behavioral and social drivers of COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake among unvaccinated Americans in the US April-May 2021.

Neetu Abad, Seth D Messinger, Qian Huang, Megan A Hendrich, Nataly Johanson, Helen Fisun, Zachary Lewis, Elisabeth Wilhelm, Brittney Baack, Kimberly E Bonner and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neetu AbadUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6999-4494
Seth D MessingerIpsos US Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Qian HuangGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Megan A HendrichIpsos US Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0526-5468
Nataly JohansonIpsos US Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Helen FisunIpsos US Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Zachary LewisIpsos US Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Elisabeth WilhelmUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Brittney BaackUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Kimberly E BonnerUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Rosemarie KobauUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Noel T BrewerGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USIpsos (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAround one-third of Americans reported they were unwilling to get a COVID-19 vaccine in April 2021. This focus group study aimed to provide insights on the factors contributing to unvaccinated adults' hesitancy or refusal to get vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines.

methodIpsos recruited 59 unvaccinated US adults who were vaccine hesitant (i.e., conflicted about or opposed to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination) using the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Trained facilitators led a total of 10 focus groups via video-conference in March and April 2021. Two coders manually coded the data from each group using a coding frame based on the focus group discussion guide. The coding team collaborated in analyzing the data for key themes.

resultsData analysis of transcripts from the focus groups illuminated four main themes associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: lack of trust in experts and institutions; concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines; resistance towards prescriptive guidance and restrictions; and, despite personal reluctance or unwillingness to get vaccinated, acceptance of others getting vaccinated. DISCUSSION: Vaccine confidence communication strategies should address individual concerns, describe the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, and highlight evolving science using factural and neutral presentations of information to foster trust.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36763680
PMCPMC9917274
OpenAlexW4319879421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.