ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Global dynamics of neural mass models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concurrent Multimodal Imaging Demonstrates That EEG-Based Excitation/Inhibition Balance Reflects Glutamate and GABA Balance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as a surrogate brain: bridging neural dynamical models and data.National science review · 2026Review
- Wave turbulence and cortical dynamics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of frequency-dependent neocortical response to thalamic neurostimulation in epilepsy.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive investigation of intracortical and corticothalamic models of the alpha rhythm.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Arbor-TVB: a novel multi-scale co-simulation framework with a case study on neural-level seizure generation and whole-brain propagation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- A cortical field theory - dynamics and symmetries.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Linking fast and slow: The case for generative models.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Criticality and partial synchronization analysis in Wilson-Cowan and Jansen-Rit neural mass models.PloS one · 2024Article
- Modelling cortical network dynamics.SN applied sciences · 2024Article
- Cortical Synchrony and Information Flow during Transition from Wakefulness to Light Non-Rapid Eye Movement Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Global search metaheuristics for neural mass model calibration.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural mass models are used to simulate cortical dynamics and to explain the electrical and magnetic fields measured using electro- and magnetoencephalography. Simulations evince a complex phase-space structure for these kinds of models; including stationary points and limit cycles and the possibility for bifurcations and transitions among different modes of activity. This complexity allows neural mass models to describe the itinerant features of brain dynamics. However, expressive, nonlinear neural mass models are often difficult to fit to empirical data without additional simplifying assumptions: e.g., that the system can be modelled as linear perturbations around a fixed point. In this study we offer a mathematical analysis of neural mass models, specifically the canonical microcircuit model, providing analytical solutions describing slow changes in the type of cortical activity, i.e. dynamical itinerancy. We derive a perturbation analysis up to second order of the phase flow, together with adiabatic approximations. This allows us to describe amplitude modulations in a relatively simple mathematical format providing analytic proof-of-principle for the existence of semi-stable states of cortical dynamics at the scale of a cortical column. This work allows for model inversion of neural mass models, not only around fixed points, but over regions of phase space that encompass transitions among semi or multi-stable states of oscillatory activity. Crucially, these theoretical results speak to model inversion in the context of multiple semi-stable brain states, such as the transition between interictal, pre-ictal and ictal activity in epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.