Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Consequences of arthropod community structure for an at-risk insectivorous bird.

Cee S Nell, Riley Pratt, Jutta Burger, Kristine L Preston, Kathleen K Treseder, Dana Kamada, Karly Moore, Kailen A Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cee S NellDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Riley PrattDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Jutta BurgerIrvine Ranch Conservancy, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Kristine L PrestonNatural Communities Coalition, Irvine, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6958-1128
Kathleen K TresederDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Dana KamadaNatural Communities Coalition, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Karly MooreNatural Communities Coalition, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Kailen A MooneyDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-7794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global declines in bird and arthropod abundance highlights the importance of understanding the role of food limitation and arthropod community composition for the performance of insectivorous birds. In this study, we link data on nestling diet, arthropod availability and nesting performance for the Coastal Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis), an at-risk insectivorous bird native to coastal southern California and Baja Mexico. We used DNA metabarcoding to characterize nestling diets and monitored 8 bird territories over two years to assess the relationship between arthropod and vegetation community composition and bird reproductive success. We document a discordance between consumed prey and arthropod biomass within nesting territories, in which Diptera and Lepidoptera were the most frequently consumed prey taxa but were relatively rare in the environment. In contrast other Orders (e.g., Hemiptera, Hymenoptera)were abundant in the environment but were absent from nestling diets. Accordingly, variation in bird reproductive success among territories was positively related to the relative abundance of Lepidoptera (but not Diptera), which were most abundant on 2 shrub species (Eriogonum fasciculatum, Sambucus nigra) of the 9 habitat elements characterized (8 dominant plant species and bare ground). Bird reproductive success was in turn negatively related to two invasive arthropods whose abundance was not associated with preferred bird prey, but instead possibly acted through harassment (Linepithema humile; Argentine ants) and parasite transmission or low nutritional quality (Armadillidium vulgare; "pill-bug"). These results demonstrate how multiple aspects of arthropod community structure can influence bird performance through complementary mechanisms, and the importance of managing for arthropods in bird conservation efforts.

Indexed as

AntsArthropodsLepidopteraSongbirdsAnimalsBiomassEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID36763634
PMCPMC9917275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.