Trial reportPloS one2023
Efficiency analysis by training sequence of high-fidelity simulation-based neonatal resuscitation program (NRP).
Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual reality simulation for chemotherapy drug spill management training in pharmacy education: A cohort-allocated crossover quasi-experimental study in Taiwan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Use of digital technologies for staff education and training programmes on newborn resuscitation and complication management: a scoping review.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to find a more effective education method in a neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) using a high-fidelity simulation that has recently shown positive results in terms of its effectiveness. STUDY
designA single-blind prospective cohort study was performed. The high-fidelity simulation model was used in a formal NRP training course for trainees caring for neonatal patients. The trainees were divided into a group that conducted the scenario after the lecture (Group A) and a group that attended the lecture after the scenario (Group B) and they both took the test before, during, and after the training.
resultsThe increase in score after theory training was statistically significant in both groups, but the final score did not differ between the two groups. However, when compared by career, in Group A, trainees under 24 months tended to be more effective, and in Group B, trainees over 24 months tended to be more effective.
conclusionThe difference in short-term memory of trainees according to the order of education identified by the test score was not prominent, but it was found that the degree of difference in test scores for the order of education tended to be different according to the career. It is thought that the effectiveness of the training might be increased by changing the education order according to the degree of experience of each trainee. More effective educational methods should be introduced by continuously developing lectures for repeated education of various trainees in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.