ArticlePloS one2023
Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG): Rasch validation.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Evaluating Body Awareness: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Methodology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preliminary Rasch analysis of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness in adults with stroke.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo validate the Physical Body Experiences Questionnaire simplified for Active aGing (PBE-QAG) with Rasch Measurement Theory. PBE-QAG measures body awareness during physical activity.
methodsCommunity-dwelling adults were recruited at the Minnesota State Fair, Highland Fest, and in the Brain Body Mind Lab (University of Minnesota). They completed demographic, clinical, and behavioral questionnaires and the PBE-QAG, which has 12 items, with scoring options ranging between 0 (totally true) and 4 (totally false). A lower total PBE-QAG score on reflects better body awareness. We validated the structural validity of PBE-QAG in community-dwelling older adults, and in community-dwelling adults (18-99 years of age). We also performed a pilot structural validity in community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke. We evaluated item and person fit, targeting, unidimensionality, person separation reliability, differential item functioning for demographic and clinical characteristics, principal component of residuals, and local item dependence.
resultsWe obtained unidimensionality and item fit after deleting and rescoring items in older adults (n = 133), adults (n = 530), and adults with chronic stroke (n = 36). In community-dwelling adults, 7 participants did not fit the model (1.13%). There was minimal floor (5.28%), no ceiling effect (0.00%), and no local item dependence or differential item functioning. The person mean location was -1.77±1.22 logits.
conclusionsPBE-QAG demonstrated good item and person fit, but the targeting is off. Therefore, the current version of PBE-QAG is not recommended for use in community-dwelling adults. We encourage further validation of PBE-QAG by adding more difficult items. We also recommend evaluating the PBE-QAG in a larger group of adults with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.