Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763595›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An adversarial collaboration protocol for testing contrasting predictions of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory.

Lucia Melloni, Liad Mudrik, Michael Pitts, Katarina Bendtz, Oscar Ferrante, Urszula Gorska, Rony Hirschhorn, Aya Khalaf, Csaba Kozma, Alex Lepauvre and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Full interhemispheric integration sustained by a fraction of posterior callosal fibers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Lucia MelloniNeural Circuits, Consciousness and Cognition Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Liad MudrikSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michael PittsPsychology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-3443
Katarina BendtzChildren's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Oscar FerranteCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Urszula GorskaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3808-337X
Rony HirschhornSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7710-5159
Aya KhalafDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Csaba KozmaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Alex LepauvreNeural Circuits, Consciousness and Cognition Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ling LiuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Science, Peking University, Peking, China.
David MazumderChildren's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David RichterDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hao ZhouCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hal BlumenfeldDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Melanie BolyDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
David J ChalmersDepartment of Philosophy, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Sasha DevoreDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Francis FallonPhilosophy Department, St. John's University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Floris P de LangeDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ole JensenCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Gabriel KreimanChildren's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3505-8475
Huan LuoSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Science, Peking University, Peking, China.
Theofanis I PanagiotaropoulosCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Stanislas DehaeneCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Christof KochMindScope Program, Allen Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Giulio TononiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBoston Children's Hospital · USInserm · FRMax Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics · DENew York University · USPeking University · CNRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Birmingham · GBAllen Institute · USCairo University · EGReed College · USSt. John's University · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between conscious experience and brain activity has intrigued scientists and philosophers for centuries. In the last decades, several theories have suggested different accounts for these relationships. These theories have developed in parallel, with little to no cross-talk among them. To advance research on consciousness, we established an adversarial collaboration between proponents of two of the major theories in the field, Global Neuronal Workspace and Integrated Information Theory. Together, we devised and preregistered two experiments that test contrasting predictions of these theories concerning the location and timing of correlates of visual consciousness, which have been endorsed by the theories' proponents. Predicted outcomes should either support, refute, or challenge these theories. Six theory-impartial laboratories will follow the study protocol specified here, using three complementary methods: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Magneto-Electroencephalography (M-EEG), and intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG). The study protocol will include built-in replications, both between labs and within datasets. Through this ambitious undertaking, we hope to provide decisive evidence in favor or against the two theories and clarify the footprints of conscious visual perception in the human brain, while also providing an innovative model of large-scale, collaborative, and open science practice.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessInformation TheoryBrainElectroencephalographyHumansVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID36763595
PMCPMC9916582
OpenAlexW4319825978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.