Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Modifying the five-time sit-to-stand test to allow use of the upper limbs: Assessing initial evidence of construct validity among lower limb prosthesis users.

Ignacio A Gaunaurd, Sara J Morgan, Geoffrey S Balkman, Anat Kristal, Rachael E Rosen, Jessica S Haynes, Robert S Gailey, Brian J Hafner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ignacio A GaunaurdDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-0684
Sara J MorganDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Geoffrey S BalkmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Anat KristalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Rachael E RosenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5076-2244
Jessica S HaynesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Robert S GaileyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Brian J HafnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-1869

Funding

A Client-Based Outcome System for Individuals with Lower Limb AmputationR01HD065340 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAFNER, BRIAN J · 2014 to 2022
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Five-time Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS) Test is a performance-based measure used by clinicians and researchers to assess the body functions needed to accomplish sit-to-stand transitions (e.g., lower limb strength, balance, and trunk control). The current requirements for performance of the 5xSTS Test (i.e., crossing arms over the chest) may not be appropriate for many, if not most lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. The study aims were to (1) develop a modified five-time sit-to-stand (m5xSTS) Test protocol; (2) to examine initial evidence of known-groups construct validity among LLP users by comparing differences in performance by amputation level, amputation etiology, and functional level; and (3) to assess initial evidence of convergent construct validity by examining the correlations between m5xSTS performance with self-reported mobility (Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)), self-reported balance confidence (Activities-balance Confidence Scale (ABC)) and functional capability (comfortable walking speed). Three-hundred sixty-one LLP users participated in this cross-sectional study. The investigators developed a m5xSTS Test protocol that allows tested individuals to use different assistance strategies (i.e., use of upper limbs to push off thighs, push up from the armrests, or use a walker) when needed to perform the test. The investigators recorded m5xSTS Test times and assistance strategies. Significant differences in m5xSTS Test times were found between those who did and did not use an assistance strategy, as well as between participants grouped by different amputation level, etiology, and functional level. Significant moderate negative correlations were found between m5xSTS Test times and PLUS-M T-score (ρ = -0.42, p<0.001), ABC score (ρ = -0.42, p<0.001), and comfortable walking speed (ρ = -0.64, p<0.001), respectively. The m5xSTS Test allows LLP users to perform sit-to-stand transitions in a manner that accounts for their functional impairments, is consistent with post-amputation training, and is safe for the tested individual. Results from this study provide preliminary evidence of known groups and convergent construct validity for the m5xSTS Test with a large national sample of LLP users.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsAmputation, SurgicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLower ExtremityUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID36763586
PMCPMC9916626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.