Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763529›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Neural parameter calibration for large-scale multiagent models.

Thomas Gaskin, Grigorios A Pavliotis, Mark Girolami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Machine learning for parameter estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas GaskinDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-4431
Grigorios A PavliotisDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3468-9227
Mark GirolamiDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-253X

Funding

UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P020720/2UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P031587/1UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R004889/1UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R018413/2UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R034710/1UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T000414/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models have become a powerful tool in the quantitative sciences to understand the behavior of complex systems that evolve in time. However, they often contain a potentially large number of free parameters whose values cannot be obtained from theory but need to be inferred from data. This is especially the case for models in the social sciences, economics, or computational epidemiology. Yet, many current parameter estimation methods are mathematically involved and computationally slow to run. In this paper, we present a computationally simple and fast method to retrieve accurate probability densities for model parameters using neural differential equations. We present a pipeline comprising multiagent models acting as forward solvers for systems of ordinary or stochastic differential equations and a neural network to then extract parameters from the data generated by the model. The two combined create a powerful tool that can quickly estimate densities on model parameters, even for very large systems. We demonstrate the method on synthetic time series data of the SIR model of the spread of infection and perform an in-depth analysis of the Harris-Wilson model of economic activity on a network, representing a nonconvex problem. For the latter, we apply our method both to synthetic data and to data of economic activity across Greater London. We find that our method calibrates the model orders of magnitude more accurately than a previous study of the same dataset using classical techniques, while running between 195 and 390 times faster.

Indexed as

model calibrationmultiagent systemsneural differential equationsparameter density estimation

Identifiers

PMID36763529
PMCPMC9963791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.