ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023
Neural parameter calibration for large-scale multiagent models.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifiable learning of dissipative dynamics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep learning four decades of human migration.Nature · 2026Article
- Enhancing generalizability of model discovery across parameter space with multi-experiment equation learning for biological systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Optimising pandemic response through vaccination strategies using neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Modelling global trade with optimal transport.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Fast adaptation of physics-informed hybrid models for pneumatic artificial muscles.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- A Simple Approximate Bayesian Inference Neural Surrogate for Stochastic Petri Net Models.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with mechanistic epidemiological modeling: a scoping review of opportunities and challenges.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Chemical waves in reaction-diffusion networks of small organic molecules.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Building Digital Twins for Cardiovascular Health: From Principles to Clinical Impact.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Inferring networks from time series: A neural approach.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Neural parameter calibration and uncertainty quantification for epidemic forecasting.PloS one · 2024Article
- Machine learning for parameter estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models have become a powerful tool in the quantitative sciences to understand the behavior of complex systems that evolve in time. However, they often contain a potentially large number of free parameters whose values cannot be obtained from theory but need to be inferred from data. This is especially the case for models in the social sciences, economics, or computational epidemiology. Yet, many current parameter estimation methods are mathematically involved and computationally slow to run. In this paper, we present a computationally simple and fast method to retrieve accurate probability densities for model parameters using neural differential equations. We present a pipeline comprising multiagent models acting as forward solvers for systems of ordinary or stochastic differential equations and a neural network to then extract parameters from the data generated by the model. The two combined create a powerful tool that can quickly estimate densities on model parameters, even for very large systems. We demonstrate the method on synthetic time series data of the SIR model of the spread of infection and perform an in-depth analysis of the Harris-Wilson model of economic activity on a network, representing a nonconvex problem. For the latter, we apply our method both to synthetic data and to data of economic activity across Greater London. We find that our method calibrates the model orders of magnitude more accurately than a previous study of the same dataset using classical techniques, while running between 195 and 390 times faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.